WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund is a Thematic fund and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund is a Thematic fund. In the year to 30-10-2026, WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) returned −8.7% and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) returned −7.7%. WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund charges 0.98% a year and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund 1.04% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 66.2%: they hold 40 of the same securities.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund
Thematic
- 1 year return
- −8.7%
- Expense ratio
- 0.98%
- NAV
- ₹9.91
WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund
Thematic
- 1 year return
- −7.7%
- Expense ratio
- 1.04%
- NAV
- ₹9.97
Which is better, WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy or WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity returned more over 1 year: −7.7% against −8.7%.
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy costs less: 0.98% a year against 1.04% (Direct plans).
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity fell less in its worst fall since 30-01-2025: −16.4% against −17.2%.
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy holds more in large companies: 65.1% of the fund in large caps against 51.6%.
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity is the larger fund: ₹553 Cr against ₹46 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 66.2%: 40 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund | WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund |
| Category | Thematic | Thematic |
| AUM | ₹46 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹553 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹9.91 (Direct) | ₹9.97 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.98% | 1.04% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 2.66% | 2.70% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 100 ESG TRI | BSE Quality TRI |
| Launch date | 30-10-2024 | 29-01-2025 |
| Minimum investment | ₹500 | ₹500 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal | Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal |
| Exit load | Nil | Nil |
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | +0.45% | −6.35% | −0.02% | −8.67% | -- | -- | -- |
| WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) | −0.24% | −7.72% | +0.56% | −7.65% | -- | -- | -- |
| Thematic average | −2.09% | −4.52% | +0.86% | −1.22% | -- | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 235 Thematic funds, same plan type.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: Year-wise Returns
| Year | ESG Best-In-Class StrategyWhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy | Quality EquityWhiteOak Capital Quality Equity |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −8.52% | −7.78% |
| 2025 | +6.74% | -- |
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against NIFTY100 ESG TRI, the benchmark of WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund
Rolling returns
Every 1-year holding period, 184 of them, one for each trading day from 30-01-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
to
Feb 2026Apr 2025
to
Apr 2026May 2025
to
May 2026Jul 2025
to
Jul 2026Aug 2025
to
Aug 2026Oct 2025
to
Oct 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy | 65.2 | 20.1 | 9.2 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.1% | −2.3% | −10.8% | 11.1% | 0% |
| WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity | 63.6 | 29.3 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.4% | −1.9% | −9.7% | 6.6% | 0% |
| NIFTY100 ESG TRI | 31.0 | 35.9 | 17.4 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.3% | 2.1% | −7.7% | 16.4% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is NIFTY100 ESG TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 30-01-2025. Past returns do not promise future returns.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-01-2025 to 30-10-2026: 22 instalments, ₹2,20,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class StrategyWhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | ₹2,20,000 | ₹2,13,586 | −₹6,414 | −3.1% |
| WhiteOak Capital Quality EquityWhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) | ₹2,20,000 | ₹2,13,743 | −₹6,257 | −3.0% |
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class StrategyWhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Quality EquityWhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −8.67% | −7.65% |
| Standard deviation | 13.19% | 12.15% |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.06 | -1.06 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.39 | -1.39 |
| Maximum drawdown | −17.2% (30-03-2026) | −16.4% (31-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.71 |
| Alpha | −4.11% | −4.30% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −0.21% | −0.33% |
| Standard deviation | 13.06% | 11.92% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.45 | -0.49 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.61 | -0.66 |
| Maximum drawdown | −17.2% (30-03-2026) | −16.4% (31-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.90 | 0.72 |
| Alpha | −1.43% | −2.78% |
From daily NAVs, 31-10-2024 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | −17.2% | 27-11-2025 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −10.1% |
| WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) | −16.4% | 26-11-2025 | 31-03-2026 | 03-08-2026 | 4 months | −9.1% |
| NIFTY100 ESG TRI | −15.4% | 07-01-2026 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −8.8% |
From daily values since 30-01-2025, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
Against NIFTY100 ESG TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | 94% | 104% | 3.34% |
| WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund (Direct) | 86% | 104% | 4.12% |
From month-end values since 30-01-2025. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund, September 2026; WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 66.2%
- Held by both
- 40
- Only in WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy
- 13
- Only in WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity
- 21
| Security | % of WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy | % of WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Bank Limited | 9.80% | 9.82% |
| Nestle India Limited | 6.16% | 6.67% |
| Bharti Airtel Limited | 6.06% | 6.10% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Limited | 4.38% | 4.16% |
| Titan Company Limited | 3.52% | 3.78% |
| Nexus Select Trust - REIT | 2.88% | 3.41% |
| Eternal Limited | 3.10% | 2.63% |
| Maruti Suzuki India Limited | 2.53% | 2.70% |
| Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited | 2.38% | 4.27% |
| Pidilite Industries Limited | 2.25% | 2.27% |
| Info Edge (India) Limited | 1.74% | 2.55% |
| Global Health Limited | 1.47% | 2.25% |
| Aadhar Housing Finance Limited | 1.46% | 1.48% |
| Muthoot Finance Limited | 1.46% | 1.49% |
| Asian Paints Limited | 1.71% | 1.26% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Limited | 1.48% | 1.23% |
| Poly Medicure Limited | 1.20% | 1.28% |
| Krishna Institute Of Medical Sciences Limited | 1.17% | 1.23% |
| Navin Fluorine International Limited | 1.62% | 1.05% |
| Max Financial Services Limited | 1.67% | 0.97% |
| Tech Mahindra Limited | 1.62% | 0.96% |
| Bajaj Finserv Limited | 2.60% | 0.86% |
| Cipla Limited | 0.83% | 1.15% |
| Vijaya Diagnostic Centre Limited | 0.84% | 0.81% |
| The Phoenix Mills Limited | 0.80% | 0.92% |
| India Shelter Finance Corporation Limited | 0.79% | 1.05% |
| Tube Investments of India Limited | 0.78% | 0.89% |
| Indigo Paints Limited | 0.76% | 0.99% |
| Rainbow Childrens Medicare Limited | 0.63% | 1.21% |
| Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited | 0.57% | 0.62% |
| Gillette India Limited | 0.55% | 1.25% |
| Safari Industries (India) Limited | 0.50% | 0.69% |
| 182 Days Tbill (MD 12/11/2026) | 1.29% | 0.48% |
| Eureka Forbes Ltd | 0.48% | 1.13% |
| National Stock Exchange Of India Ltd | 0.53% | 0.40% |
| Coforge Limited | 2.03% | 0.19% |
| Infosys Limited | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| 91 Days Tbill (MD 03/12/2026) | 1.28% | 0.13% |
| 364 Days Tbill (MD 12/11/2026) | 0.32% | 0.13% |
| Persistent Systems Limited | 0.04% | 2.08% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 66.2% means 66.2% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Limited | 6.42% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | 3.15% |
| Bharat Electronics Limited | 2.25% |
| Power Grid Corporation of India Limited | 1.86% |
| 182 Days Tbill (MD 17/12/2026) | 1.49% |
Largest holdings only in WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Marico Limited | 2.42% |
| SBI Funds Management Limited | 1.48% |
| Abbott India Limited | 1.47% |
| Doms Industries Limited | 1.45% |
| Tata Consumer Products Limited | 1.28% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 90.2% | 85.9% |
| Debt | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| Cash and others | 5.4% | 10.2% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 65.1% | 51.6% |
| Mid Cap | 11.5% | 13.1% |
| Small Cap | 13.1% | 19.4% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 0.5% | 1.9% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 20.4% | 9.8% |
| Consumer Durables | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Automobiles | 6.9% | 6.9% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 3.7% | 6.9% |
| Food Products | 6.2% | 6.7% |
| Finance | 6.3% | 4.9% |
| Telecom - Services | 6.1% | 6.1% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund | WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.98% | 1.04% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.68% | 0.69% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 2.66% | 2.70% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 2.10% | 2.09% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy with
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs HDFC Defence
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs HDFC Pharma and Healthcare
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs SBI Healthcare Opportunities
- WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy vs Aditya Birla Sun Life International Equity
Compare WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity with
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity vs HDFC Defence
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity vs HDFC Pharma and Healthcare
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity vs SBI Healthcare Opportunities
- WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity vs Aditya Birla Sun Life International Equity
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund?
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund is a Thematic fund, WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund is a Thematic fund, run by WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 66.2%. WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund charges 0.98% a year and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund 1.04%.
Which has given higher returns, WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund or WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund?
Over 1 year: WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund −8.67%, WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund −7.65%. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund or WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund?
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund charges less: 0.98% a year against 1.04%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund overlap?
66.2%. They hold 40 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being ICICIBANK, NESTLEIND, BHARTIARTL. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund or WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund is rated Very High and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund Very High. Over 1 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 13.19% and 12.15% a year.
Can I invest in both WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund?
Yes. 66.2% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund and WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund?
WhiteOak Capital ESG Best-In-Class Strategy Fund: Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal. WhiteOak Capital Quality Equity Fund: Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.