Quantum Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
Quantum Value Fund and UTI Value Fund are both Value and Contra funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Quantum Value Fund (Direct) returned 9.5% a year and UTI Value Fund (Direct) returned 11.7% a year. Quantum Value Fund charges 1.14% a year and UTI Value Fund 1.35% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 40.1%: they hold 17 of the same securities.
Quantum Value Fund
Value and Contra
- 3 year return
- 9.5%
- Expense ratio
- 1.14%
- NAV
- ₹119.47
Which is better, Quantum Value or UTI Value? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- UTI Value returned more over 5 years: 9.9% a year against 8.7%.
- UTI Value returned more over 3 years: 11.7% a year against 9.5%.
- Quantum Value costs less: 1.14% a year against 1.35% (Direct plans).
- Quantum Value swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 12.3% a year against 13.3%.
- UTI Value fell less in its worst fall since 02-01-2013: −36.7% against −40.0%.
- UTI Value holds more in large companies: 65.6% of the fund in large caps against 51.3%.
- UTI Value is the larger fund: ₹9,025 Cr against ₹1,048 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 40.1%: 17 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | Quantum Value Fund | UTI Value Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | Quantum Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
| Category | Value and Contra | Value and Contra |
| AUM | ₹1,048 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹9,025 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹119.47 (Direct) | ₹173.12 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.14% | 1.35% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 2.17% | 1.87% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | BSE 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| Launch date | 13-03-2006 | 20-07-2005 |
| Minimum investment | ₹500 | Regular Plan-Growth- Rs.5000, Regular Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.5000, Regular Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Growth- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.5000, |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | George Thomas, Christy Mathia | Amit Premchandani FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4 |
| Exit load | For units in excess of 10% of the investment, exit load of 2% if redeemed within 365 days, 1% if redeemed after 365 days but within 730 days. | Exit Load for units in excess of 10% of the investment,1% will be charged for redemption within 1 year. |
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | +1.07% | −6.65% | −3.40% | −10.00% | +9.52% | +8.72% | +10.02% |
| UTI Value Fund (Direct) | −0.22% | −6.08% | −3.22% | −9.06% | +11.71% | +9.95% | +12.87% |
| Value and Contra average | −2.09% | −5.76% | −3.23% | −5.72% | +11.83% | +11.08% | +12.63% |
Category average: the average of the 30 Value and Contra funds, same plan type.
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: Year-wise Returns
| Year | QuantumQuantum Value | UTIUTI Value |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −10.83% | −9.69% |
| 2025 | +4.63% | +7.71% |
| 2024 | +22.71% | +24.28% |
| 2023 | +27.61% | +27.63% |
| 2022 | +7.10% | +5.04% |
| 2021 | +25.53% | +31.35% |
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against BSE 500 TRI, the benchmark of Quantum Value Fund
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 2,668 of them, one for each trading day from 04-01-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
UTI Value Fund (Direct)
BSE 500 TRI
to
Nov 2016Sept 2015
to
Sept 2018Jul 2017
to
Jul 2020May 2019
to
May 2022Mar 2021
to
Mar 2024Dec 2022
to
Dec 2025
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Value | 5.8 | 5.0 | 10.1 | 34.6 | 30.7 | 11.7 | 2.1 | 13.6% | 13.8% | −10.7% | 31.1% | 35% |
| UTI Value | 1.5 | 3.6 | 20.2 | 24.5 | 29.8 | 17.7 | 2.7 | 14.6% | 15.1% | −5.4% | 33.2% | 55% |
| BSE 500 TRI | 1.8 | 4.2 | 7.9 | 36.8 | 34.2 | 11.7 | 3.3 | 14.8% | 14.9% | −6.2% | 33.9% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is BSE 500 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 02-01-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-01-2013 to 30-10-2026: 166 instalments, ₹16,60,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum ValueQuantum Value Fund (Direct) | ₹16,60,000 | ₹37,55,423 | ₹20,95,423 | 11.1% |
| UTI ValueUTI Value Fund (Direct) | ₹16,60,000 | ₹43,43,176 | ₹26,83,176 | 12.9% |
Quantum ValueQuantum Value Fund (Direct)
UTI ValueUTI Value Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | UTI Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −10.00% | −9.06% |
| Standard deviation | 13.02% | 13.51% |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.17 | -1.06 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.54 | -1.40 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.8% (30-03-2026) | −15.3% (31-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.86 | 0.92 |
| Alpha | −4.15% | −2.77% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | UTI Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +9.52% | +11.71% |
| Standard deviation | 12.25% | 13.31% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.29 | 0.43 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.9% (30-03-2026) | −17.2% (07-04-2025) |
| Beta | 0.82 | 0.91 |
| Alpha | +0.32% | +1.86% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | UTI Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +8.72% | +9.95% |
| Standard deviation | 12.83% | 13.42% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.23 | 0.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.31 | 0.42 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.9% (30-03-2026) | −17.3% (17-06-2022) |
| Beta | 0.86 | 0.91 |
| Alpha | +0.47% | +1.40% |
From daily NAVs, 29-10-2021 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | UTI Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +10.67% | +12.86% |
| Standard deviation | 14.51% | 15.09% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.30 | 0.45 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.41 | 0.61 |
| Maximum drawdown | −40.0% (23-03-2020) | −36.7% (23-03-2020) |
| Beta | 0.86 | 0.93 |
| Alpha | +0.26% | +0.53% |
From daily NAVs, 03-01-2011 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
UTI Value Fund (Direct)
BSE 500 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | −40.0% | 03-06-2019 | 23-03-2020 | 24-11-2020 | 8 months | −12.0% |
| UTI Value Fund (Direct) | −36.7% | 07-02-2020 | 23-03-2020 | 05-11-2020 | 7 months | −10.7% |
| BSE 500 TRI | −38.1% | 17-01-2020 | 23-03-2020 | 06-11-2020 | 7 months | −9.4% |
From daily values since 02-01-2013, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
UTI Value Fund (Direct)
BSE 500 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
UTI Value Fund (Direct)
BSE 500 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 5-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
UTI Value Fund (Direct)
BSE 500 TRI
Against BSE 500 TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | 86% | 82% | 5.00% |
| UTI Value Fund (Direct) | 95% | 90% | 3.32% |
From month-end values since 02-01-2013. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Quantum Value Fund, September 2026; UTI Value Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 40.1%
- Held by both
- 17
- Only in Quantum Value
- 17
- Only in UTI Value
- 47
| Security | % of Quantum Value | % of UTI Value |
|---|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Ltd | 5.81% | 7.97% |
| ICICI Bank Ltd | 4.85% | 6.26% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd | 4.53% | 4.16% |
| Axis Bank Ltd | 3.49% | 3.94% |
| Infosys Ltd | 4.12% | 3.19% |
| Bharti Airtel Ltd | 3.10% | 4.23% |
| Tech Mahindra Ltd | 3.53% | 2.58% |
| State Bank of India | 2.54% | 3.30% |
| Cipla Ltd | 2.85% | 1.72% |
| IndusInd Bank Ltd | 1.95% | 1.72% |
| Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Ltd | 2.91% | 1.39% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd | 1.30% | 2.99% |
| HDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd | 3.29% | 1.16% |
| Dabur India Ltd | 1.99% | 1.10% |
| Hero MotoCorp Ltd | 3.26% | 0.85% |
| Dr. Reddy''s Laboratories Ltd | 2.89% | 0.66% |
| Tata Steel Ltd | 0.47% | 1.63% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 40.1% means 40.1% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in Quantum Value Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd | 4.40% |
| Exide Industries Ltd | 3.76% |
| Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd | 3.16% |
| Container Corporation of India Ltd | 3.11% |
| ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd | 3.10% |
Largest holdings only in UTI Value Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| EQ - RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. | 2.50% |
| EQ - POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDI | 1.88% |
| EQ - MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 1.86% |
| EQ - PHOENIX MILLS LTD | 1.82% |
| EQ - MPHASIS LTD | 1.61% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | Quantum Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 95.7% | 99.3% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Cash and others | 4.3% | 0.4% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | Quantum Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 51.3% | 65.6% |
| Mid Cap | 23.4% | 18.3% |
| Small Cap | 20.8% | 15.5% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | Quantum Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 23.2% | 28.1% |
| IT - Software | 14.5% | 8.3% |
| Insurance | 12.4% | 1.2% |
| Automobiles | 6.2% | 8.0% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 5.7% | 6.6% |
| Finance | 4.7% | 1.5% |
| Realty | 2.2% | 4.5% |
| Telecom - Services | 3.1% | 4.2% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
Quantum Value vs UTI Value: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | Quantum Value Fund | UTI Value Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 1.14% | 1.35% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.92% | 1.05% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 2.17% | 1.87% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.79% | 1.51% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare Quantum Value with
Quantum Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Quantum Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?
Both are Value and Contra funds, run by Quantum Mutual Fund and UTI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 40.1%. Quantum Value Fund charges 1.14% a year and UTI Value Fund 1.35%.
Which has given higher returns, Quantum Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?
Over 1 year: Quantum Value Fund −10.00%, UTI Value Fund −9.06%. Over 3 years: Quantum Value Fund +9.52% a year, UTI Value Fund +11.71% a year. Over 5 years: Quantum Value Fund +8.72% a year, UTI Value Fund +9.95% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, Quantum Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?
Quantum Value Fund charges less: 1.14% a year against 1.35%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do Quantum Value Fund and UTI Value Fund overlap?
40.1%. They hold 17 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being HDFCBANK, ICICIBANK, KOTAKBANK. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, Quantum Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, Quantum Value Fund is rated Very High and UTI Value Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 12.25% and 13.31% a year.
Which is better for SIP, Quantum Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?
Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,25,862 in Quantum Value Fund (XIRR 6.8% a year) and ₹7,59,479 in UTI Value Fund (XIRR 8.6% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both Quantum Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?
Yes. 40.1% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages Quantum Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?
Quantum Value Fund: George Thomas, Christy Mathia. UTI Value Fund: Amit Premchandani FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.