Quant Value Fund vs Quantum Value Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
Quant Value Fund and Quantum Value Fund are both Value and Contra funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Quant Value Fund (Direct) returned 19.1% a year and Quantum Value Fund (Direct) returned 9.5% a year. Quant Value Fund charges 0.92% a year and Quantum Value Fund 1.14% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 1.4%: they hold 1 of the same security.
Quantum Value Fund
Value and Contra
- 3 year return
- 9.5%
- Expense ratio
- 1.14%
- NAV
- ₹119.47
Which is better, Quant Value or Quantum Value? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Quant Value returned more over 3 years: 19.1% a year against 9.5%.
- Quant Value returned more over 1 year: 3.2% against −10.0%.
- Quant Value costs less: 0.92% a year against 1.14% (Direct plans).
- Quantum Value swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 12.3% a year against 18.8%.
- Quantum Value fell less in its worst fall since 01-12-2021: −15.9% against −24.0%.
- Quantum Value holds more in large companies: 51.3% of the fund in large caps against 40.4%.
- Quant Value is the larger fund: ₹1,917 Cr against ₹1,048 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 1.4%: 1 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | Quant Value Fund | Quantum Value Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | quant Mutual Fund | Quantum Mutual Fund |
| Category | Value and Contra | Value and Contra |
| AUM | ₹1,917 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹1,048 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹22.01 (Direct) | ₹119.47 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.92% | 1.14% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 2.46% | 2.17% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | BSE 500 TRI |
| Launch date | 11-06-2023 | 13-03-2006 |
| Minimum investment | ₹5,000 | ₹500 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma | George Thomas, Christy Mathia |
| Exit load | Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days. | For units in excess of 10% of the investment, exit load of 2% if redeemed within 365 days, 1% if redeemed after 365 days but within 730 days. |
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Value Fund (Direct) | −5.26% | −8.30% | −3.73% | +3.16% | +19.06% | -- | -- |
| Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | +1.07% | −6.65% | −3.40% | −10.00% | +9.52% | +8.72% | +10.02% |
| Value and Contra average | −2.09% | −5.76% | −3.23% | −5.72% | +11.83% | +11.08% | +12.63% |
Category average: the average of the 30 Value and Contra funds, same plan type.
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: Year-wise Returns
| Year | QuantQuant Value | QuantumQuantum Value |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | +4.09% | −10.83% |
| 2025 | +1.39% | +4.63% |
| 2024 | +25.90% | +22.71% |
| 2023 | +39.00% | +27.61% |
| 2022 | +17.29% | +7.10% |
| 2021 | -- | +25.53% |
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty 500 TRI, the benchmark of Quant Value Fund
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 472 of them, one for each trading day from 02-12-2024 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
Quant Value Fund (Direct)
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
Nifty 500 TRI
to
Jan 2025May 2022
to
May 2025Sept 2022
to
Sept 2025Jan 2023
to
Jan 2026May 2023
to
May 2026Sept 2023
to
Sept 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.5 | 58.9 | 32.6 | 23.8% | 23.3% | 17.6% | 32.3% | 100% |
| Quantum Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.4 | 20.1 | 59.7 | 12.7 | 0.0 | 16.6% | 17.4% | 8.0% | 24.1% | 70% |
| Nifty 500 TRI | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 37.9 | 51.9 | 6.1 | 0.0 | 15.3% | 15.4% | 8.8% | 22.3% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is Nifty 500 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 01-12-2021. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-12-2021 to 30-10-2026: 59 instalments, ₹5,90,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant ValueQuant Value Fund (Direct) | ₹5,90,000 | ₹8,45,923 | ₹2,55,923 | 14.7% |
| Quantum ValueQuantum Value Fund (Direct) | ₹5,90,000 | ₹6,95,552 | ₹1,05,552 | 6.6% |
Quant ValueQuant Value Fund (Direct)
Quantum ValueQuantum Value Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | Quant Value Fund (Direct) | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +3.16% | −10.00% |
| Standard deviation | 18.26% | 13.02% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.11 | -1.17 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.15 | -1.54 |
| Maximum drawdown | −13.9% (23-10-2026) | −15.8% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.07 | 0.86 |
| Alpha | +11.35% | −4.15% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Quant Value Fund (Direct) | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +19.06% | +9.52% |
| Standard deviation | 18.80% | 12.25% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.69 | 0.29 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.94 | 0.40 |
| Maximum drawdown | −24.0% (03-03-2025) | −15.9% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.15 | 0.82 |
| Alpha | +8.20% | +0.32% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Quant Value Fund (Direct) | Quantum Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +17.32% | +10.67% |
| Standard deviation | 19.26% | 14.51% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.60 | 0.30 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 |
| Maximum drawdown | −24.0% (03-03-2025) | −40.0% (23-03-2020) |
| Beta | 1.16 | 0.86 |
| Alpha | +7.33% | +0.26% |
From daily NAVs, 01-12-2021 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
Quant Value Fund (Direct)
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
Nifty 500 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Value Fund (Direct) | −24.0% | 31-07-2024 | 03-03-2025 | 05-05-2026 | 14 months | −11.9% |
| Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | −15.9% | 26-09-2024 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −12.0% |
| Nifty 500 TRI | −18.6% | 26-09-2024 | 28-02-2025 | Not yet | -- | −8.8% |
From daily values since 01-12-2021, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Quant Value Fund (Direct)
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
Nifty 500 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Quant Value Fund (Direct)
Quantum Value Fund (Direct)
Nifty 500 TRI
Against Nifty 500 TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Value Fund (Direct) | 134% | 103% | 10.55% |
| Quantum Value Fund (Direct) | 86% | 76% | 4.32% |
From month-end values since 01-12-2021. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Quant Value Fund, September 2026; Quantum Value Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 1.4%
- Held by both
- 1
- Only in Quant Value
- 32
- Only in Quantum Value
- 33
| Security | % of Quant Value | % of Quantum Value |
|---|---|---|
| LIC Housing Finance Ltd | 1.35% | 2.75% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 1.4% means 1.4% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in Quant Value Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10 | 15.73% |
| Adani Enterprises Limited | 9.32% |
| Piramal Finance Ltd | 9.13% |
| Adani Green Energy Limited | 8.18% |
| Indus Towers Limited | 7.31% |
Largest holdings only in Quantum Value Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Ltd | 5.81% |
| ICICI Bank Ltd | 4.85% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd | 4.53% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd | 4.40% |
| Infosys Ltd | 4.12% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | Quant Value | Quantum Value |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 76.7% | 95.7% |
| Debt | 23.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash and others | -0.1% | 4.3% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | Quant Value | Quantum Value |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 40.4% | 51.3% |
| Mid Cap | 16.2% | 23.4% |
| Small Cap | 20.1% | 20.8% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | Quant Value | Quantum Value |
|---|---|---|
| N.A. | 76.7% | 0.0% |
| Banks | 0.0% | 23.2% |
| IT - Software | 0.0% | 14.5% |
| Insurance | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Automobiles | 0.0% | 6.2% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 0.0% | 5.7% |
| Finance | 0.0% | 4.7% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
Quant Value vs Quantum Value: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | Quant Value Fund | Quantum Value Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.92% | 1.14% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.48% | 0.92% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 2.46% | 2.17% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.78% | 1.79% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Quant Value Fund vs Quantum Value Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Quant Value Fund and Quantum Value Fund?
Both are Value and Contra funds, run by quant Mutual Fund and Quantum Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 1.4%. Quant Value Fund charges 0.92% a year and Quantum Value Fund 1.14%.
Which has given higher returns, Quant Value Fund or Quantum Value Fund?
Over 1 year: Quant Value Fund +3.16%, Quantum Value Fund −10.00%. Over 3 years: Quant Value Fund +19.06% a year, Quantum Value Fund +9.52% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, Quant Value Fund or Quantum Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund charges less: 0.92% a year against 1.14%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do Quant Value Fund and Quantum Value Fund overlap?
1.4%. They hold 1 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being LICHSGFIN. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, Quant Value Fund or Quantum Value Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, Quant Value Fund is rated Very High and Quantum Value Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 18.80% and 12.25% a year.
Which is better for SIP, Quant Value Fund or Quantum Value Fund?
Over the last 3 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 03-10-2023 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹4,05,667 in Quant Value Fund (XIRR 5.9% a year) and ₹3,65,708 in Quantum Value Fund (XIRR -0.7% a year). Both received 37 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both Quant Value Fund and Quantum Value Fund?
Yes. 1.4% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so the two hold mostly different investments.
Who manages Quant Value Fund and Quantum Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund: Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma. Quantum Value Fund: George Thomas, Christy Mathia.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.