Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund are both Balanced Advantage funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct) returned 7.8% a year and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) returned 11.4% a year. UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan charges 1.11% a year and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund 0.84% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 20.8%: they hold 23 of the same securities.

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan

    Balanced Advantage

    3 year return
    7.8%
    Expense ratio
    1.11%
    NAV
    ₹45.91
    See UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan

    WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund

    Balanced Advantage

    3 year return
    11.4%
    Expense ratio
    0.84%
    NAV
    ₹15.21
    See WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund

    Which is better, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan or WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage returned more over 3 years: 11.4% a year against 7.8%.
    • UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan returned more over 1 year: −0.5% against −0.6%.
    • WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage costs less: 0.84% a year against 1.11% (Direct plans).
    • UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 5.6% a year against 8.3%.
    • UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan fell less in its worst fall since 13-02-2023: −8.2% against −9.6%.
    • WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage holds more in large companies: 45.8% of the fund in large caps against 23.8%.
    • UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan is the larger fund: ₹4,930 Cr against ₹2,256 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 20.8%: 23 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund
    Fund houseUTI Mutual FundWhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund
    CategoryBalanced AdvantageBalanced Advantage
    AUM₹4,930 Cr (30-09-2026)₹2,256 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹45.91 (Direct)₹15.21 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)1.11%0.84%
    Expense ratio (Regular)1.60%2.25%
    RiskometerHighVery High
    BenchmarkNIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 50:50 IndexCRISIL Hybrid 50+50 - Moderate Index
    Launch date01-10-197110-02-2023
    Minimum investmentMinimum target amount under the scheme is 15000 which is required to be invested over 10/15 year period.₹500
    Lock inNoneNone
    Fund managersAnurag Mittal FM 1, Ajay Tyagi FM 2, Kamal Gada FM 3 Mr. Akash Shah FM 4Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal
    Exit loadIf withdrawn prematurely – 2% On or after maturity – NilNil

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)−0.03%−2.17%+3.96%−0.53%+7.84%+5.73%+7.58%
    WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)−0.45%−2.43%+2.18%−0.57%+11.37%----
    Balanced Advantage average−0.55%−2.88%+0.08%−2.08%+9.14%----

    Category average: the average of the 38 Balanced Advantage funds, same plan type.

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: Year-wise Returns

    YearUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanWhiteOak Capital Balanced AdvantageWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage
    2026to date+0.38%−0.97%
    2025+5.12%+8.62%
    2024+12.24%+18.70%
    2023+12.76%--
    2022−1.60%--
    2021+15.42%--

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 174 of them, one for each trading day from 13-02-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    0%5%10%15%20%
    Mar 2023
    to
    Mar 2026
    Apr 2023
    to
    Apr 2026
    Jun 2023
    to
    Jun 2026
    Jul 2023
    to
    Jul 2026
    Aug 2023
    to
    Aug 2026
    Oct 2023
    to
    Oct 2026
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighest
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan0.00.0100.00.00.00.00.08.2%8.2%7.2%9.7%
    WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage0.00.00.094.35.70.00.012.8%12.7%10.7%15.5%

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 13-02-2023. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-02-2023 to 30-10-2026: 45 instalments, ₹4,50,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanUTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct) ₹4,50,000 ₹5,00,565 ₹50,565 5.6%
    WhiteOak Capital Balanced AdvantageWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) ₹4,50,000 ₹5,23,912 ₹73,912 8.1%
    ₹0₹2.0 L₹4.0 L₹6.0 L
    202420252026
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanUTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)WhiteOak Capital Balanced AdvantageWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureUTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+7.84%+11.37%
    Standard deviation5.63%8.34%
    Sharpe ratio0.320.64
    Sortino ratio0.460.88
    Maximum drawdown−8.2% (30-03-2026)−9.6% (30-03-2026)
    Beta----
    Alpha----

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −10%−8%−6%−4%−2%0%
    202420252026
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)−8.2%16-10-202530-03-202606-07-20263 months−3.4%
    WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)−9.6%20-11-202530-03-202606-07-20263 months−4.2%

    From daily values since 13-02-2023, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%2%4%6%8%10%
    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Direct)WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan, September 2026; WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    20.8%
    Held by both
    23
    Only in UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan
    85
    Only in WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage
    117
    Security% of UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan% of WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage
    EQ - ICICI BANK LTD2.53%6.97%
    EQ - HDFC BANK LIMITED2.03%3.93%
    EQ - ETERNAL LIMITED2.89%1.94%
    EQ - COFORGE LTD1.62%2.47%
    EQ - KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.1.51%1.88%
    EQ - BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.1.46%2.87%
    EQ - TITAN COMPANY LTD.1.72%1.35%
    EQ - MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD.1.04%1.93%
    06.94% GSEC Mat- 11/05/20361.00%1.42%
    EQ - MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.0.87%1.23%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 20.8% means 20.8% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan

    Security% of fund
    07.18% GSEC MAT -24/07/20378.09%
    07.32% GSEC MAT -13/11/20304.12%
    7.24% GSEC MAT- 18/08/20552.60%
    NCD MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD2.53%
    NCD INDIAN RAILWAY FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED2.01%

    Largest holdings only in WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund

    Security% of fund
    Embassy Office Parks REIT2.82%
    Nexus Select Trust - REIT2.71%
    State Bank of India1.90%
    Reliance Industries Limited1.75%
    7.77% Bajaj Finance Limited (17/04/2029)1.75%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage
    Equity38.0%66.1%
    Debt53.3%17.2%
    Cash and others8.7%16.7%

    Market cap of stocks

    Market capUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage
    Large Cap23.8%45.8%
    Mid Cap10.7%7.4%
    Small Cap3.5%8.9%
    Not on AMFI's list0.0%4.0%

    Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.

    Largest sectors

    SectorUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage
    Banks6.5%15.6%
    Retailing6.7%3.0%
    IT - Software4.0%5.8%
    Consumer Durables4.3%2.6%
    Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology3.4%4.3%
    Finance2.6%3.6%
    Automobiles2.8%3.2%

    The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeUTI - Unit Linked Insurance PlanWhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)1.11%0.84%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.92%0.54%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)1.60%2.25%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)1.37%1.74%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan vs WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    Both are Balanced Advantage funds, run by UTI Mutual Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 20.8%. UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan charges 1.11% a year and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund 0.84%.

    Which has given higher returns, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan or WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    Over 1 year: UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan −0.53%, WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund −0.57%. Over 3 years: UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan +7.84% a year, WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund +11.37% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan or WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund charges less: 0.84% a year against 1.11%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund overlap?

    20.8%. They hold 23 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being ICICIBANK, HDFCBANK, ETERNAL. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is riskier, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan or WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    On SEBI's riskometer, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan is rated High and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 5.63% and 8.34% a year.

    Which is better for SIP, UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan or WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    Over the last 3 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 03-10-2023 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹3,96,749 in UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan (XIRR 4.5% a year) and ₹4,06,673 in WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund (XIRR 6.1% a year). Both received 37 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    Yes. 20.8% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so some of the two investments would move together.

    Who manages UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan and WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund?

    UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan: Anurag Mittal FM 1, Ajay Tyagi FM 2, Kamal Gada FM 3 Mr. Akash Shah FM 4. WhiteOak Capital Balanced Advantage Fund: Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs