Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    Nippon India Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund are both Value and Contra funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Nippon India Value Fund (Direct) returned 11.7% a year and UTI Value Fund (Direct) returned 11.7% a year. Nippon India Value Fund charges 1.26% a year and UTI Value Fund 1.35% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 40.5%: they hold 21 of the same securities.

    Nippon India Value Fund

    Value and Contra

    3 year return
    11.7%
    Expense ratio
    1.26%
    NAV
    ₹226.85
    See Nippon India Value Fund

    UTI Value Fund

    Value and Contra

    3 year return
    11.7%
    Expense ratio
    1.35%
    NAV
    ₹173.12
    See UTI Value Fund

    Which is better, Nippon India Value or UTI Value? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • Nippon India Value returned more over 5 years: 11.5% a year against 9.9%.
    • UTI Value returned more over 3 years: 11.7% a year against 11.7%.
    • Nippon India Value costs less: 1.26% a year against 1.35% (Direct plans).
    • UTI Value swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 13.3% a year against 15.2%.
    • UTI Value fell less in its worst fall since 02-01-2013: −36.7% against −38.6%.
    • UTI Value is the larger fund: ₹9,025 Cr against ₹8,479 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 40.5%: 21 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactNippon India Value FundUTI Value Fund
    Fund houseNippon India Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
    CategoryValue and ContraValue and Contra
    AUM₹8,479 Cr (30-09-2026)₹9,025 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹226.85 (Direct)₹173.12 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)1.26%1.35%
    Expense ratio (Regular)1.99%1.87%
    RiskometerVery HighVery High
    BenchmarkNifty 500 TRINifty 500 TRI
    Launch date08-06-200520-07-2005
    Minimum investment₹500Regular Plan-Growth- Rs.5000, Regular Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.5000, Regular Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Growth- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.5000,
    Lock inNoneNone
    Fund managersDhrumil Shah FM 1, Meenakshi Dawar FM 2Amit Premchandani FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4
    Exit loadFor units more than 10% of the investments, an exit load of 1% if redeemed within 12 months.Exit Load for units in excess of 10% of the investment,1% will be charged for redemption within 1 year.

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    Nippon India Value Fund (Direct)−2.97%−8.85%−7.67%−11.61%+11.65%+11.46%+14.20%
    UTI Value Fund (Direct)−0.22%−6.08%−3.22%−9.06%+11.71%+9.95%+12.87%
    Value and Contra average−2.09%−5.76%−3.23%−5.72%+11.83%+11.08%+12.63%

    Category average: the average of the 30 Value and Contra funds, same plan type.

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: Year-wise Returns

    YearNippon IndiaNippon India ValueUTIUTI ValueNifty 500 TRI
    2026to date−10.89%−9.69%−7.51%
    2025+4.93%+7.71%+7.76%
    2024+23.19%+24.28%+16.24%
    2023+43.41%+27.63%+26.91%
    2022+5.52%+5.04%+4.25%
    2021+40.31%+31.35%+31.60%

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty 500 TRI, the benchmark of both

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 2,666 of them, one for each trading day from 04-01-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    −10%0%10%20%30%40%
    Nov 2013
    to
    Nov 2016
    Sept 2015
    to
    Sept 2018
    Jul 2017
    to
    Jul 2020
    May 2019
    to
    May 2022
    Mar 2021
    to
    Mar 2024
    Dec 2022
    to
    Dec 2025
    Nippon India Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)Nifty 500 TRI

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighestBeat benchmark
    Nippon India Value2.54.87.119.821.825.218.917.7%18.6%−6.5%36.4%76%
    UTI Value1.53.620.224.529.817.72.714.6%15.1%−5.4%33.2%56%
    Nifty 500 TRI1.94.37.837.034.811.32.914.7%14.9%−6.3%33.5%--

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is Nifty 500 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 02-01-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026: 166 instalments, ₹16,60,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    Nippon India ValueNippon India Value Fund (Direct) ₹16,60,000 ₹50,50,708 ₹33,90,708 14.9%
    UTI ValueUTI Value Fund (Direct) ₹16,60,000 ₹43,43,176 ₹26,83,176 12.9%
    ₹0₹20.0 L₹40.0 L₹60.0 L
    2014201620182020202220242026
    Nippon India ValueNippon India Value Fund (Direct)UTI ValueUTI Value Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureNippon India Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+11.65%+11.71%
    Standard deviation15.19%13.31%
    Sharpe ratio0.370.43
    Sortino ratio0.500.59
    Maximum drawdown−17.6% (03-03-2025)−17.2% (07-04-2025)
    Beta1.040.91
    Alpha+1.27%+1.86%

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −40%−30%−20%−10%0%
    2014201620182020202220242026
    Nippon India Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)Nifty 500 TRI
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    Nippon India Value Fund (Direct)−38.6%23-01-201823-03-202011-11-20208 months−12.7%
    UTI Value Fund (Direct)−36.7%07-02-202023-03-202005-11-20207 months−10.7%
    Nifty 500 TRI−38.1%17-01-202023-03-202006-11-20207 months−8.8%

    From daily values since 02-01-2013, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%5%10%15%20%25%
    20172019202120232025
    Nippon India Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)Nifty 500 TRI

    Against Nifty 500 TRI

    FundUp captureDown captureTracking error
    Nippon India Value Fund (Direct)110%105%4.97%
    UTI Value Fund (Direct)94%89%3.36%

    From month-end values since 02-01-2013. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Nippon India Value Fund, September 2026; UTI Value Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    40.5%
    Held by both
    21
    Only in Nippon India Value
    64
    Only in UTI Value
    43
    Security% of Nippon India Value% of UTI Value
    HDFC Bank Limited7.31%7.97%
    Axis Bank Limited3.81%3.94%
    ICICI Bank Limited3.36%6.26%
    State Bank of India4.37%3.30%
    Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited3.27%4.16%
    Reliance Industries Limited2.69%2.50%
    Bharti Airtel Limited2.32%4.23%
    Maruti Suzuki India Limited1.85%1.86%
    IndusInd Bank Limited2.69%1.72%
    Infosys Limited1.55%3.19%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 40.5% means 40.5% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in Nippon India Value Fund

    Security% of fund
    Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited2.50%
    Piramal Finance Limited2.20%
    Kaynes Technology India Limited2.11%
    Bajaj Finance Limited2.02%
    Tata Consultancy Services Limited1.86%

    Largest holdings only in UTI Value Fund

    Security% of fund
    EQ - MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD.2.99%
    EQ - TECH MAHINDRA LTD.2.58%
    EQ - POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDI1.88%
    EQ - CIPLA LTD.1.72%
    EQ - TATA STEEL LTD.1.63%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetNippon India ValueUTI Value
    Equity96.6%99.3%
    Debt0.0%0.3%
    Cash and others3.4%0.4%

    Market cap of stocks

    Market capNippon India ValueUTI Value
    Large Cap56.6%65.6%
    Mid Cap18.6%18.3%
    Small Cap20.1%15.5%
    Not on AMFI's list1.2%0.0%

    Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.

    Largest sectors

    SectorNippon India ValueUTI Value
    Banks26.1%28.1%
    IT - Software6.4%8.3%
    Automobiles1.9%8.0%
    Consumer Durables7.6%2.6%
    Power6.9%3.0%
    Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology3.2%6.6%
    Finance6.0%1.5%
    Realty0.3%4.5%
    Telecom - Services2.9%4.2%
    Electrical Equipment3.5%0.3%

    The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.

    Nippon India Value vs UTI Value: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeNippon India Value FundUTI Value Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)1.26%1.35%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.90%1.05%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)1.99%1.87%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)1.53%1.51%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    Nippon India Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?

    Both are Value and Contra funds, run by Nippon India Mutual Fund and UTI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 40.5%. Nippon India Value Fund charges 1.26% a year and UTI Value Fund 1.35%.

    Which has given higher returns, Nippon India Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    Over 1 year: Nippon India Value Fund −11.61%, UTI Value Fund −9.06%. Over 3 years: Nippon India Value Fund +11.65% a year, UTI Value Fund +11.71% a year. Over 5 years: Nippon India Value Fund +11.46% a year, UTI Value Fund +9.95% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, Nippon India Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    Nippon India Value Fund charges less: 1.26% a year against 1.35%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund overlap?

    40.5%. They hold 21 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being HDFCBANK, AXISBANK, ICICIBANK. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is riskier, Nippon India Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    On SEBI's riskometer, Nippon India Value Fund is rated Very High and UTI Value Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 15.19% and 13.31% a year.

    Which is better for SIP, Nippon India Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,71,254 in Nippon India Value Fund (XIRR 9.2% a year) and ₹7,59,479 in UTI Value Fund (XIRR 8.6% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?

    Yes. 40.5% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.

    Who manages Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?

    Nippon India Value Fund: Dhrumil Shah FM 1, Meenakshi Dawar FM 2. UTI Value Fund: Amit Premchandani FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs