Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund vs PGIM India Midcap Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Midcap Fund are both Mid Cap funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) returned 8.5% a year and PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) returned 10.9% a year. Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund charges 0.80% a year and PGIM India Midcap Fund 0.72% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 43.5%: they hold 49 of the same securities.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund
Mid Cap
- 3 year return
- 8.5%
- Expense ratio
- 0.80%
- NAV
- ₹178.86
PGIM India Midcap Fund
Mid Cap
- 3 year return
- 10.9%
- Expense ratio
- 0.72%
- NAV
- ₹72.91
Which is better, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap or PGIM India Midcap? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Nippon India Growth Mid Cap returned more over 5 years: 9.3% a year against 9.0%.
- PGIM India Midcap returned more over 3 years: 10.9% a year against 8.5%.
- PGIM India Midcap costs less: 0.72% a year against 0.80% (Direct plans).
- PGIM India Midcap swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 15.2% a year against 17.9%.
- PGIM India Midcap fell less in its worst fall since 05-12-2013: −36.4% against −53.5%.
- Nippon India Growth Mid Cap is the larger fund: ₹50,176 Cr against ₹10,537 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 43.5%: 49 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund | PGIM India Midcap Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | Nippon India Mutual Fund | PGIM India Mutual Fund |
| Category | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| AUM | ₹50,176 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹10,537 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹178.86 (Direct) | ₹72.91 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.80% | 0.72% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 1.56% | 1.92% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI |
| Launch date | 08-10-1995 | 02-12-2013 |
| Minimum investment | ₹100 | ₹5,000 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Rupesh Patel FM 1 | Vivek Sharma, Utsav Mehta, Vinay Paharia, and Mr. Puneet Pal |
| Exit load | 1% if redeemed or switched out on or before completion of 1 month from the date of allotment of units.Nil, thereafter. | Exit load of 0.5%, if redeemed within 90 days. |
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | −3.37% | −7.25% | −2.86% | −8.89% | +8.47% | +9.29% | +8.19% |
| PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | −2.49% | −5.26% | −0.03% | −4.98% | +10.86% | +9.04% | +15.44% |
| Mid Cap average | −3.36% | −6.03% | −0.14% | −2.17% | +14.75% | +12.95% | +14.07% |
Category average: the average of the 34 Mid Cap funds, same plan type.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: Year-wise Returns
| Year | Nippon India Growth Mid CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap | PGIM India MidcapPGIM India Midcap | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −7.94% | −2.03% | −4.97% |
| 2025 | −3.20% | +1.27% | +5.98% |
| 2024 | +20.39% | +22.48% | +24.46% |
| 2023 | +43.11% | +22.47% | +44.61% |
| 2022 | +2.20% | −0.10% | +3.91% |
| 2021 | +40.41% | +66.92% | +48.16% |
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty Midcap 150 TRI, the benchmark of both
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 2,441 of them, one for each trading day from 05-12-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
to
Sept 2017May 2016
to
May 2019Jan 2018
to
Jan 2021Oct 2019
to
Oct 2022Jun 2021
to
Jun 2024Jan 2023
to
Jan 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | 15.4 | 16.4 | 13.8 | 14.8 | 20.3 | 10.0 | 9.3 | 10.8% | 12.3% | −16.0% | 32.6% | 0% |
| PGIM India Midcap | 2.9 | 5.7 | 17.5 | 22.6 | 16.4 | 9.0 | 25.9 | 18.2% | 15.2% | −8.0% | 49.5% | 46% |
| Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | 5.4 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 10.4 | 10.9 | 28.5 | 31.2 | 19.4% | 22.1% | −8.3% | 40.6% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is Nifty Midcap 150 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 05-12-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-12-2013 to 30-10-2026: 155 instalments, ₹15,50,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | ₹15,50,000 | ₹30,08,038 | ₹14,58,038 | 9.7% |
| PGIM India MidcapPGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | ₹15,50,000 | ₹46,82,536 | ₹31,32,536 | 15.9% |
Nippon India Growth Mid CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
PGIM India MidcapPGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −8.89% | −4.98% |
| Standard deviation | 17.86% | 15.73% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.79 | -0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.00 | -0.88 |
| Maximum drawdown | −19.0% (31-03-2026) | −15.1% (23-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.97 | 0.93 |
| Alpha | −4.81% | −1.29% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +8.47% | +10.86% |
| Standard deviation | 17.85% | 15.16% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.14 | 0.32 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.18 | 0.44 |
| Maximum drawdown | −24.7% (17-03-2025) | −19.1% (28-02-2025) |
| Beta | 0.95 | 0.85 |
| Alpha | −4.93% | −1.79% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +9.29% | +9.04% |
| Standard deviation | 17.20% | 15.01% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.20 | 0.22 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Maximum drawdown | −24.7% (17-03-2025) | −19.5% (20-06-2022) |
| Beta | 0.94 | 0.86 |
| Alpha | −4.11% | −3.68% |
From daily NAVs, 29-10-2021 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +8.87% | +16.64% |
| Standard deviation | 18.74% | 16.43% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.15 | 0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.19 | 0.88 |
| Maximum drawdown | −53.5% (03-04-2020) | −36.4% (23-03-2020) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | −53.5% | 08-01-2018 | 03-04-2020 | 09-07-2021 | 15 months | −14.9% |
| PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | −36.4% | 15-01-2018 | 23-03-2020 | 06-08-2020 | 4 months | −7.9% |
| Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | −43.1% | 08-01-2018 | 23-03-2020 | 23-11-2020 | 8 months | −10.5% |
From daily values since 05-12-2013, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 5-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
Against Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | 87% | 105% | 8.90% |
| PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | 90% | 85% | 6.44% |
From month-end values since 05-12-2013. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund, September 2026; PGIM India Midcap Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 43.5%
- Held by both
- 49
- Only in Nippon India Growth Mid Cap
- 51
- Only in PGIM India Midcap
- 54
| Security | % of Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | % of PGIM India Midcap |
|---|---|---|
| The Federal Bank Limited | 2.59% | 2.61% |
| AU Small Finance Bank Limited | 2.84% | 2.10% |
| Mankind Pharma Limited | 1.95% | 2.46% |
| Eternal Limited | 2.42% | 1.88% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited | 3.22% | 1.71% |
| One 97 Communications Limited | 2.04% | 1.60% |
| BSE Limited | 2.40% | 1.49% |
| Max Healthcare Institute Limited | 1.46% | 1.43% |
| Max Financial Services Limited | 1.34% | 1.75% |
| Persistent Systems Limited | 1.73% | 1.29% |
| Bharat Forge Limited | 1.96% | 1.12% |
| Prestige Estates Projects Limited | 1.10% | 2.08% |
| Dixon Technologies (India) Limited | 1.10% | 1.16% |
| GE Vernova T&D India Limited | 2.01% | 1.09% |
| ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited | 2.06% | 1.08% |
| FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited | 1.07% | 1.82% |
| Info Edge (India) Limited | 2.55% | 1.05% |
| IPCA Laboratories Limited | 1.19% | 0.97% |
| Radico Khaitan Limited | 0.95% | 1.09% |
| Indian Bank | 1.05% | 0.88% |
| CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited | 0.87% | 1.21% |
| Torrent Power Limited | 0.87% | 1.00% |
| APL Apollo Tubes Limited | 1.27% | 0.84% |
| Tube Investments of India Limited | 1.26% | 0.76% |
| Ashok Leyland Limited | 1.14% | 0.71% |
| Vishal Mega Mart Limited | 0.70% | 1.61% |
| Fortis Healthcare Limited | 2.53% | 0.68% |
| Schaeffler India Limited | 0.70% | 0.67% |
| Varun Beverages Limited | 1.94% | 0.60% |
| LG Electronics India Ltd | 0.60% | 1.15% |
| Bharat Electronics Limited | 0.77% | 0.56% |
| Astral Limited | 0.55% | 1.06% |
| Blue Star Limited | 0.55% | 1.10% |
| ITC Hotels Limited | 0.54% | 0.73% |
| Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited | 1.41% | 0.53% |
| Endurance Technologies Limited | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Mphasis Limited | 0.50% | 0.66% |
| Sundaram Finance Limited | 0.84% | 0.48% |
| Container Corporation of India Limited | 0.47% | 1.04% |
| Lupin Limited | 0.89% | 0.45% |
| Jubilant Foodworks Limited | 1.02% | 0.43% |
| Coromandel International Limited | 0.42% | 1.28% |
| Timken India Limited | 0.40% | 0.99% |
| Supreme Industries Limited | 0.96% | 0.39% |
| Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited | 0.49% | 0.37% |
| REC Limited | 2.12% | 0.34% |
| JK Cement Limited | 0.31% | 1.74% |
| Apar Industries Limited | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| InterGlobe Aviation Limited | 0.27% | 1.30% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 43.5% means 43.5% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Samvardhana Motherson International Limited | 1.69% |
| Gland Pharma Limited | 1.62% |
| Cholamandalam Financial Holdings Limited | 1.49% |
| Voltas Limited | 1.47% |
| NTPC Green Energy Limited | 1.45% |
Largest holdings only in PGIM India Midcap Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Aditya Birla Capital Ltd. | 2.32% |
| Bharti Hexacom Ltd. | 2.30% |
| UNO Minda Ltd. | 2.08% |
| TVS Motor Company Ltd. | 1.73% |
| Solar Industries India Ltd. | 1.71% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | PGIM India Midcap |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 99.0% | 97.3% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash and others | 1.0% | 2.5% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | PGIM India Midcap |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 21.5% | 19.7% |
| Mid Cap | 65.9% | 66.2% |
| Small Cap | 11.5% | 10.0% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 0.1% | 1.5% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | PGIM India Midcap |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 10.0% | 8.7% |
| Auto Components | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 7.7% | 8.4% |
| Retailing | 8.4% | 7.7% |
| Finance | 8.0% | 5.5% |
| Capital Markets | 7.3% | 6.1% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap vs PGIM India Midcap: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund | PGIM India Midcap Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.80% | 0.72% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.60% | 0.48% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 1.56% | 1.92% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.25% | 1.49% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare Nippon India Growth Mid Cap with
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund vs PGIM India Midcap Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Midcap Fund?
Both are Mid Cap funds, run by Nippon India Mutual Fund and PGIM India Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 43.5%. Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund charges 0.80% a year and PGIM India Midcap Fund 0.72%.
Which has given higher returns, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Midcap Fund?
Over 1 year: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund −8.89%, PGIM India Midcap Fund −4.98%. Over 3 years: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund +8.47% a year, PGIM India Midcap Fund +10.86% a year. Over 5 years: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund +9.29% a year, PGIM India Midcap Fund +9.04% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Midcap Fund?
PGIM India Midcap Fund charges less: 0.72% a year against 0.80%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Midcap Fund overlap?
43.5%. They hold 49 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being FEDERALBNK, AUBANK, MANKIND. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Midcap Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund is rated Very High and PGIM India Midcap Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 17.85% and 15.16% a year.
Which is better for SIP, Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund or PGIM India Midcap Fund?
Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,38,906 in Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund (XIRR 7.5% a year) and ₹7,50,971 in PGIM India Midcap Fund (XIRR 8.1% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Midcap Fund?
Yes. 43.5% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and PGIM India Midcap Fund?
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund: Rupesh Patel FM 1. PGIM India Midcap Fund: Vivek Sharma, Utsav Mehta, Vinay Paharia, and Mr. Puneet Pal.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.