PGIM India Midcap Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
PGIM India Midcap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund are both Mid Cap funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) returned 10.9% a year and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) returned 20.4% a year. PGIM India Midcap Fund charges 0.72% a year and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund 0.93% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 32.6%: they hold 44 of the same securities.
PGIM India Midcap Fund
Mid Cap
- 3 year return
- 10.9%
- Expense ratio
- 0.72%
- NAV
- ₹72.91
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
Mid Cap
- 3 year return
- 20.4%
- Expense ratio
- 0.93%
- NAV
- ₹21.98
Which is better, PGIM India Midcap or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap returned more over 3 years: 20.4% a year against 10.9%.
- WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap returned more over 1 year: 3.6% against −5.0%.
- PGIM India Midcap costs less: 0.72% a year against 0.93% (Direct plans).
- PGIM India Midcap swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 15.2% a year against 15.8%.
- PGIM India Midcap fell less in its worst fall since 08-09-2022: −19.1% against −19.3%.
- PGIM India Midcap holds more in large companies: 19.7% of the fund in large caps against 4.7%.
- PGIM India Midcap is the larger fund: ₹10,537 Cr against ₹7,540 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 32.6%: 44 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | PGIM India Midcap Fund | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | PGIM India Mutual Fund | WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund |
| Category | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| AUM | ₹10,537 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹7,540 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹72.91 (Direct) | ₹21.98 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.72% | 0.93% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 1.92% | 2.24% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | BSE Midcap 150 TRI |
| Launch date | 02-12-2013 | 07-09-2022 |
| Minimum investment | ₹5,000 | ₹500 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Vivek Sharma, Utsav Mehta, Vinay Paharia, and Mr. Puneet Pal | Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal |
| Exit load | Exit load of 0.5%, if redeemed within 90 days. | Nil |
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | −2.49% | −5.26% | −0.03% | −4.98% | +10.86% | +9.04% | +15.44% |
| WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | −2.15% | −4.73% | +4.05% | +3.63% | +20.42% | -- | -- |
| Mid Cap average | −3.36% | −6.03% | −0.14% | −2.17% | +14.75% | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 34 Mid Cap funds, same plan type.
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: Year-wise Returns
| Year | PGIM India MidcapPGIM India Midcap | WhiteOak Capital Mid CapWhiteOak Capital Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −2.03% | +3.98% |
| 2025 | +1.27% | +6.68% |
| 2024 | +22.48% | +35.48% |
| 2023 | +22.47% | +43.99% |
| 2022 | −0.10% | -- |
| 2021 | +66.92% | -- |
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty Midcap 150 TRI, the benchmark of PGIM India Midcap Fund
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 281 of them, one for each trading day from 08-09-2025 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
to
Oct 2025Dec 2022
to
Dec 2025Mar 2023
to
Mar 2026May 2023
to
May 2026Jul 2023
to
Jul 2026Sept 2023
to
Sept 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Midcap | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 75.8 | 23.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 13.7% | 13.9% | 9.6% | 16.3% | 0% |
| WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 30.2 | 68.0 | 25.8% | 26.4% | 19.1% | 29.6% | 100% |
| Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 18.1 | 70.5 | 1.8 | 21.3% | 22.5% | 12.7% | 26.0% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is Nifty Midcap 150 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 08-09-2022. Past returns do not promise future returns.
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-09-2022 to 30-10-2026: 50 instalments, ₹5,00,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India MidcapPGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | ₹5,00,000 | ₹5,78,880 | ₹78,880 | 7.0% |
| WhiteOak Capital Mid CapWhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | ₹5,00,000 | ₹7,14,115 | ₹2,14,115 | 17.3% |
PGIM India MidcapPGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Mid CapWhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −4.98% | +3.63% |
| Standard deviation | 15.73% | 15.20% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.65 | -0.11 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.88 | -0.15 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.1% (23-03-2026) | −14.0% (23-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.93 | 0.90 |
| Alpha | −1.29% | +7.82% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +10.86% | +20.42% |
| Standard deviation | 15.16% | 15.85% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.32 | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Maximum drawdown | −19.1% (28-02-2025) | −19.3% (07-04-2025) |
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.90 |
| Alpha | −1.79% | +7.68% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +16.64% | +20.72% |
| Standard deviation | 16.43% | 14.65% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.65 | 0.99 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.88 | 1.36 |
| Maximum drawdown | −36.4% (23-03-2020) | −19.3% (07-04-2025) |
| Beta | -- | 0.89 |
| Alpha | -- | +6.96% |
From daily NAVs, 05-12-2013 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | −19.1% | 23-09-2024 | 28-02-2025 | 16-09-2025 | 7 months | −7.9% |
| WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | −19.3% | 16-12-2024 | 07-04-2025 | 30-06-2025 | 3 months | −8.2% |
| Nifty Midcap 150 TRI | −20.9% | 24-09-2024 | 28-02-2025 | 12-11-2025 | 8 months | −10.5% |
From daily values since 08-09-2022, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct)
WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct)
Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
Against Nifty Midcap 150 TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Midcap Fund (Direct) | 75% | 87% | 5.88% |
| WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (Direct) | 105% | 84% | 4.51% |
From month-end values since 08-09-2022. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: PGIM India Midcap Fund, September 2026; WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 32.6%
- Held by both
- 44
- Only in PGIM India Midcap
- 59
- Only in WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap
- 105
| Security | % of PGIM India Midcap | % of WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| The Federal Bank Ltd. | 2.61% | 2.50% |
| Bharti Hexacom Ltd. | 2.30% | 2.78% |
| Max Financial Services Ltd. | 1.75% | 2.48% |
| Vishal Mega Mart Ltd | 1.61% | 1.96% |
| Lenskart Solutions Ltd. | 1.31% | 1.66% |
| Ajanta Pharma Ltd. | 1.24% | 1.32% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd. | 1.71% | 1.07% |
| Info Edge (India) Ltd. | 1.05% | 1.87% |
| Persistent Systems Ltd. | 1.29% | 1.01% |
| IPCA Laboratories Ltd. | 0.97% | 1.33% |
| JSW Infrastructure Ltd. | 1.51% | 0.94% |
| FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd. | 1.82% | 0.87% |
| Max Healthcare Institute Ltd. | 1.43% | 0.83% |
| Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd. | 0.83% | 1.30% |
| Marico Ltd. | 0.80% | 1.45% |
| Muthoot Finance Ltd. | 0.79% | 1.05% |
| KEI Industries Ltd. | 0.79% | 1.22% |
| Tube Investments Of India Ltd. | 0.76% | 0.89% |
| Abbott India Ltd. | 0.85% | 0.75% |
| GE Vernova T&D India Limited | 1.09% | 0.73% |
| Fortis Healthcare Ltd. | 0.68% | 1.58% |
| The Phoenix Mills Ltd. | 0.68% | 1.95% |
| 360 One Wam Ltd. | 0.67% | 1.53% |
| Coromandel International Ltd. | 1.28% | 0.62% |
| Hitachi Energy India Ltd. | 0.62% | 0.72% |
| One 97 Communications Ltd. | 1.60% | 0.60% |
| Mankind Pharma Ltd. | 2.46% | 0.58% |
| Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. | 0.53% | 1.86% |
| Sai Life Sciences Ltd | 1.16% | 0.50% |
| Oil India Ltd. | 0.45% | 0.62% |
| Aditya Birla Capital Ltd. | 2.32% | 0.42% |
| Acutaas Chemicals Ltd. | 0.56% | 0.42% |
| Supreme Industries Ltd. | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. | 0.37% | 0.53% |
| National Aluminium Company Ltd. | 0.36% | 1.12% |
| REC Ltd. | 0.34% | 0.72% |
| Endurance Technologies Ltd. | 0.50% | 0.32% |
| Anthem Biosciences Ltd. | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| TBO Tek Ltd. | 0.43% | 0.27% |
| Horizon Industrial Parks Ltd. | 0.55% | 0.20% |
| AU Small Finance Bank Ltd. | 2.10% | 0.15% |
| ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. | 1.08% | 0.13% |
| Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. | 1.21% | 0.05% |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd. | 1.29% | 0.02% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 32.6% means 32.6% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in PGIM India Midcap Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| UNO Minda Ltd. | 2.08% |
| Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. | 2.08% |
| Eternal Ltd. | 1.88% |
| JK Cement Ltd. | 1.74% |
| TVS Motor Company Ltd. | 1.73% |
Largest holdings only in WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Coforge Limited | 2.73% |
| Laurus Labs Limited | 2.20% |
| Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited | 2.05% |
| Berger Paints (I) Limited | 1.39% |
| Nexus Select Trust - REIT | 1.31% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | PGIM India Midcap | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 97.3% | 85.0% |
| Debt | 0.2% | 4.2% |
| Cash and others | 2.5% | 10.8% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | PGIM India Midcap | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 19.7% | 4.7% |
| Mid Cap | 66.2% | 58.7% |
| Small Cap | 10.0% | 19.6% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | PGIM India Midcap | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Banks | 8.7% | 6.3% |
| Retailing | 7.7% | 7.4% |
| Auto Components | 7.1% | 2.9% |
| Finance | 5.5% | 6.6% |
| Capital Markets | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| Electrical Equipment | 5.3% | 5.0% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
PGIM India Midcap vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | PGIM India Midcap Fund | WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.72% | 0.93% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.48% | 0.43% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 1.92% | 2.24% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.49% | 1.54% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare PGIM India Midcap with
PGIM India Midcap Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between PGIM India Midcap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
Both are Mid Cap funds, run by PGIM India Mutual Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 32.6%. PGIM India Midcap Fund charges 0.72% a year and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund 0.93%.
Which has given higher returns, PGIM India Midcap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
Over 1 year: PGIM India Midcap Fund −4.98%, WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund +3.63%. Over 3 years: PGIM India Midcap Fund +10.86% a year, WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund +20.42% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, PGIM India Midcap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
PGIM India Midcap Fund charges less: 0.72% a year against 0.93%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do PGIM India Midcap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund overlap?
32.6%. They hold 44 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being FEDERALBNK, BHARTIHEXA, MFSL. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, PGIM India Midcap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, PGIM India Midcap Fund is rated Very High and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 15.16% and 15.85% a year.
Which is better for SIP, PGIM India Midcap Fund or WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
Over the last 3 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 03-10-2023 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹3,90,146 in PGIM India Midcap Fund (XIRR 3.4% a year) and ₹4,43,418 in WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund (XIRR 11.8% a year). Both received 37 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both PGIM India Midcap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
Yes. 32.6% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so some of the two investments would move together.
Who manages PGIM India Midcap Fund and WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund?
PGIM India Midcap Fund: Vivek Sharma, Utsav Mehta, Vinay Paharia, and Mr. Puneet Pal. WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund: Ramesh Mantri, Piyush Baranwal, Trupti Agrawal, Dheeresh Pathak, Ashish Agrawal.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.