LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage Fund
Direct Plan where a fund has one, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF is an ETF fund and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund is a Balanced Advantage fund. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF returned 7.5% a year and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) returned 8.5% a year. LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF charges 0.09% a year and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund 0.91%. Their portfolios overlap 53.8%: they hold 28 of the same securities.
UTI Balanced Advantage Fund
Balanced Advantage
- 3 year return
- 8.5%
- Expense ratio
- 0.91%
- NAV
- ₹12.80
Which is better, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF or UTI Balanced Advantage? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- UTI Balanced Advantage returned more over 3 years: 8.5% a year against 7.5%.
- UTI Balanced Advantage returned more over 1 year: −4.3% against −10.1%.
- LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF costs less: 0.09% a year against 0.91%.
- UTI Balanced Advantage swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 7.7% a year against 13.2%.
- UTI Balanced Advantage fell less in its worst fall since 17-08-2023: −10.5% against −15.4%.
- LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF holds more in large companies: 98.6% of the fund in large caps against 57.3%.
- UTI Balanced Advantage is the larger fund: ₹2,856 Cr against ₹816 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 53.8%: 28 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | LIC Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
| Category | ETF | Balanced Advantage |
| AUM | ₹816 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹2,856 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹259.04 | ₹12.80 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | Not available | 0.91% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | Not available | 2.01% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 50 TRI | NIFTY 50 Hybrid Composite Debt 50:50 Index |
| Launch date | 20-11-2015 | 10-08-2023 |
| Minimum investment | For Subscription of units directly with Mutual Fund: All direct transactions in units of the Scheme by MMs/APs or other eligible investors with the AMC/the Fund shall be at intra-day NAV based on the actual execution price of the underlying portfolio. Any | ₹5,000 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Nikhil Kapoor, Sasikant Aravamuthan | "Equity - Mr. Sachin Trivedi, Debt - Mr. Anurag Mittal " |
| Exit load | Nil | Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 90 days. |
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | +1.95% | −5.00% | −3.15% | −10.06% | +7.53% | +6.59% | +11.51% |
| UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) | +1.17% | −2.56% | +0.07% | −4.25% | +8.50% | -- | -- |
| Balanced Advantage average | −0.55% | −2.88% | +0.08% | −2.08% | +9.14% | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 38 Balanced Advantage funds, same plan type.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: Year-wise Returns
| Year | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETFLIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced AdvantageUTI Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −10.96% | −5.20% |
| 2025 | +11.82% | +10.20% |
| 2024 | +9.94% | +12.52% |
| 2023 | +21.06% | -- |
| 2022 | +5.65% | -- |
| 2021 | +25.36% | -- |
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty 50 TRI, the benchmark of LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 50 of them, one for each trading day from 17-08-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
Nifty 50 TRI
to
Aug 2026Sept 2023
to
Sept 2026Sept 2023
to
Sept 2026Sept 2023
to
Sept 2026Oct 2023
to
Oct 2026Oct 2023
to
Oct 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.1% | 6.9% | 5.3% | 9.2% | 0% |
| UTI Balanced Advantage | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.5% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 10.0% | 100% |
| Nifty 50 TRI | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.3% | 7.0% | 5.4% | 9.4% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is Nifty 50 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 17-08-2023. Past returns do not promise future returns.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-08-2023 to 30-10-2026: 39 instalments, ₹3,90,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Nifty 50 ETFLIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | ₹3,90,000 | ₹3,93,298 | ₹3,298 | 0.5% |
| UTI Balanced AdvantageUTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) | ₹3,90,000 | ₹4,14,601 | ₹24,601 | 3.7% |
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETFLIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
UTI Balanced AdvantageUTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −10.06% | −4.25% |
| Standard deviation | 13.75% | 8.94% |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.11 | -1.06 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.48 | -1.43 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.1% (31-03-2026) | −10.5% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.00 | -- |
| Alpha | −0.09% | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +7.53% | +8.50% |
| Standard deviation | 13.24% | 7.71% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.11 | 0.32 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.16 | 0.45 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.4% (04-03-2025) | −10.5% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.00 | -- |
| Alpha | −0.10% | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +11.57% | +8.17% |
| Standard deviation | 15.90% | 7.58% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.38 | 0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.52 | 0.39 |
| Maximum drawdown | −38.3% (23-03-2020) | −10.5% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.00 | -- |
| Alpha | −0.12% | -- |
From daily NAVs, 23-11-2015 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
Nifty 50 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | −15.4% | 26-09-2024 | 04-03-2025 | 27-10-2025 | 8 months | −11.6% |
| UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) | −10.5% | 02-01-2026 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −5.7% |
| Nifty 50 TRI | −15.4% | 26-09-2024 | 04-03-2025 | 23-10-2025 | 8 months | −11.6% |
From daily values since 17-08-2023, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
Nifty 50 TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct)
Nifty 50 TRI
Against Nifty 50 TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | 99% | 100% | 0.05% |
| UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (Direct) | 73% | 55% | 5.36% |
From month-end values since 17-08-2023. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF, September 2026; UTI Balanced Advantage Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 53.8%
- Held by both
- 28
- Only in LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
- 22
- Only in UTI Balanced Advantage
- 56
| Security | % of LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | % of UTI Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Ltd. | 10.39% | 6.71% |
| ICICI Bank Ltd. | 9.04% | 6.61% |
| Reliance Industries Ltd. | 7.58% | 4.29% |
| Bharti Airtel Ltd. | 5.10% | 3.50% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. | 2.94% | 3.37% |
| Axis Bank Ltd. | 3.36% | 2.91% |
| State Bank of India | 3.79% | 2.73% |
| Infosys Ltd. | 3.36% | 2.73% |
| Bajaj Finance Ltd. | 2.49% | 2.29% |
| Eternal Ltd. | 2.22% | 2.51% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. | 2.52% | 2.02% |
| Titan Company Ltd. | 1.81% | 1.89% |
| Larsen & Toubro Ltd. | 4.21% | 1.52% |
| Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd. | 1.33% | 1.26% |
| Ultratech Cement Ltd. | 1.25% | 1.29% |
| ITC Ltd. | 2.42% | 1.03% |
| Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. | 1.48% | 1.02% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. | 2.01% | 0.97% |
| Coal India Ltd. | 0.97% | 1.05% |
| JSW Steel Ltd. | 1.14% | 0.88% |
| Eicher Motors Ltd. | 0.95% | 0.80% |
| Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. | 0.72% | 0.70% |
| SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd. | 0.73% | 0.66% |
| NTPC Ltd. | 1.46% | 0.48% |
| Adani Enterprises Ltd. | 0.93% | 0.47% |
| HDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd. | 0.54% | 0.37% |
| Asian Paints Ltd. | 1.04% | 0.35% |
| Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. | 0.84% | 0.27% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 53.8% means 53.8% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. | 1.83% |
| Hindustan Unilever Ltd. | 1.59% |
| Tata Steel Ltd. | 1.47% |
| Bharat Electronics Ltd. | 1.33% |
| Shriram Finance Ltd. | 1.31% |
Largest holdings only in UTI Balanced Advantage Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| 7.06% GS MAT - 10/04/2028 | 3.71% |
| NCD EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF INDIA | 2.07% |
| NCD EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF INDIA | 1.74% |
| CP EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF INDIA | 1.71% |
| CD - SMALL INDST. DEV. BANK OF INDIA - 04/02/2027 | 1.71% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 100.0% | 68.7% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 25.0% |
| Cash and others | 0.0% | 6.3% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 98.6% | 57.3% |
| Mid Cap | 1.4% | 7.3% |
| Small Cap | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 0.0% | 1.0% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 29.5% | 23.1% |
| Petroleum Products | 7.6% | 4.3% |
| IT - Software | 7.5% | 5.7% |
| Automobiles | 6.7% | 4.8% |
| Finance | 5.4% | 2.3% |
| Telecom - Services | 5.1% | 3.5% |
| Consumer Durables | 2.9% | 3.3% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Balanced Advantage Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | Not available | 0.91% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.00% | 0.68% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | Not available | 2.01% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 0.07% | 1.68% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare UTI Balanced Advantage with
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF vs UTI Balanced Advantage Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF is an ETF fund, UTI Balanced Advantage Fund is a Balanced Advantage fund, run by LIC Mutual Fund and UTI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 53.8%. LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF charges 0.09% a year and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund 0.91%.
Which has given higher returns, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF or UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
Over 1 year: LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF −10.06%, UTI Balanced Advantage Fund −4.25%. Over 3 years: LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF +7.53% a year, UTI Balanced Advantage Fund +8.50% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF or UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF charges less: 0.09% a year against 0.91%. These are the total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund overlap?
53.8%. They hold 28 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being HDFCBANK, ICICIBANK, RELIANCE. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF or UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF is rated Very High and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 13.24% and 7.71% a year.
Which is better for SIP, LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF or UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
Over the last 3 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 03-10-2023 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹3,68,962 in LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF (XIRR -0.2% a year) and ₹3,89,002 in UTI Balanced Advantage Fund (XIRR 3.2% a year). Both received 37 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
Yes. 53.8% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund?
LIC MF Nifty 50 ETF: Nikhil Kapoor, Sasikant Aravamuthan. UTI Balanced Advantage Fund: "Equity - Mr. Sachin Trivedi, Debt - Mr. Anurag Mittal ".
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.