ICICI Prudential Quality Fund vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund is a Thematic fund and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund is a Thematic fund. In the year to 30-10-2026, ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) returned −0.9% and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) returned 75.7%. ICICI Prudential Quality Fund charges 1.44% a year and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund 1.08% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 0.0%: they hold 0 of the same securities.
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund
Thematic
- 1 year return
- −0.9%
- Expense ratio
- 1.44%
- NAV
- ₹10.42
Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund
Thematic
- 1 year return
- 75.7%
- Expense ratio
- 1.08%
- NAV
- ₹31.86
Which is better, ICICI Prudential Quality or Nippon India Taiwan Equity? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Nippon India Taiwan Equity returned more over 1 year: 75.7% against −0.9%.
- Nippon India Taiwan Equity costs less: 1.08% a year against 1.44% (Direct plans).
- ICICI Prudential Quality fell less in its worst fall since 26-05-2025: −12.8% against −29.6%.
- Nippon India Taiwan Equity holds 90.8% of the fund in foreign stocks; ICICI Prudential Quality 0.0%.
- ICICI Prudential Quality holds more in large companies: 56.0% of the fund in large caps against 0.0%.
- ICICI Prudential Quality is the larger fund: ₹2,002 Cr against ₹1,147 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 0.0%: 0 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | ICICI Prudential Quality Fund | Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund | Nippon India Mutual Fund |
| Category | Thematic | Thematic |
| AUM | ₹2,002 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹1,147 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹10.42 (Direct) | ₹31.86 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.44% | 1.08% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 2.51% | 2.36% |
| Riskometer | Not available | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 200 Quality 30 TRI | Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index (TAIEX) |
| Launch date | 23-05-2025 | 11-12-2021 |
| Minimum investment | ₹5,000 | 500; Note - Lumpsum subscription under the Scheme is suspended temporarily with effect from February 26, 2024 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Masoomi Jhurmarvala | Kinjal Desai |
| Exit load | • 1% of applicable Net Asset Value - If the amount sought to be redeemed or switched out within 1 month from allotment. • NIL - If the amount sought to be redeemed or switched out more than 1 month. | 1% if redeemed or switched out on or before completion of 3 months from the date of allotment of units. Nil, thereafter |
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) | −0.10% | −3.34% | +2.76% | −0.95% | -- | -- | -- |
| Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) | −16.05% | +11.27% | −9.87% | +75.71% | +54.78% | -- | -- |
| Thematic average | −2.09% | −4.52% | +0.86% | −1.22% | +13.76% | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 235 Thematic funds, same plan type.
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: Year-wise Returns
| Year | ICICI Prudential QualityICICI Prudential Quality | Nippon India Taiwan EquityNippon India Taiwan Equity |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −2.43% | +66.72% |
| 2025 | -- | +52.84% |
| 2024 | -- | +25.96% |
| 2023 | -- | +46.55% |
| 2022 | -- | −33.29% |
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI, the benchmark of ICICI Prudential Quality Fund
Rolling returns
Every 1-year holding period, 107 of them, one for each trading day from 26-05-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct)
Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct)
NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI
to
Jun 2026Jul 2025
to
Jul 2026Jul 2025
to
Jul 2026Aug 2025
to
Aug 2026Sept 2025
to
Sept 2026Oct 2025
to
Oct 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Quality | 10.3 | 58.9 | 29.0 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.7% | 3.1% | −3.2% | 10.4% | 100% |
| Nippon India Taiwan Equity | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 148.5% | 137.4% | 75.7% | 240.0% | 100% |
| NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI | 72.9 | 19.6 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −2.2% | −2.4% | −10.5% | 6.5% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 26-05-2025. Past returns do not promise future returns.
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 26-05-2025 to 30-10-2026: 18 instalments, ₹1,80,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential QualityICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) | ₹1,80,000 | ₹1,82,033 | ₹2,033 | 1.4% |
| Nippon India Taiwan EquityNippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) | ₹1,80,000 | ₹2,82,768 | ₹1,02,768 | 71.6% |
ICICI Prudential QualityICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct)
Nippon India Taiwan EquityNippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) | Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −0.95% | +75.71% |
| Standard deviation | 12.46% | 40.75% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.50 | 1.73 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.66 | 2.48 |
| Maximum drawdown | −12.8% (30-03-2026) | −29.6% (30-07-2026) |
| Beta | 0.79 | -- |
| Alpha | +5.10% | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) | Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +2.71% | +27.46% |
| Standard deviation | 11.14% | 32.62% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.24 | 0.66 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.32 | 0.95 |
| Maximum drawdown | −12.8% (30-03-2026) | −44.8% (25-10-2022) |
| Beta | 0.77 | -- |
| Alpha | +5.08% | -- |
From daily NAVs, 26-05-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct)
Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct)
NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) | −12.8% | 23-12-2025 | 30-03-2026 | 29-07-2026 | 4 months | −5.4% |
| Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) | −29.6% | 03-06-2026 | 30-07-2026 | Not yet | -- | −21.7% |
| NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI | −15.7% | 07-01-2026 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −11.5% |
From daily values since 26-05-2025, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct)
Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct)
NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI
Against NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Quality Fund (Direct) | 80% | 53% | 6.68% |
| Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund (Direct) | 152% | -239% | 43.85% |
From month-end values since 26-05-2025. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: ICICI Prudential Quality Fund, September 2026; Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 0.0%
- Held by both
- 0
- Only in ICICI Prudential Quality
- 71
- Only in Nippon India Taiwan Equity
- 0
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 0.0% means 0.0% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in ICICI Prudential Quality Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| ICICI Bank Ltd. | 6.50% |
| Bharat Electronics Ltd. | 4.18% |
| Divi's Laboratories Ltd. | 4.06% |
| HDFC Bank Ltd. | 3.91% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. | 3.40% |
Largest holdings only in Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund
Every holding of this fund is also held by the other.
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | ICICI Prudential Quality | Nippon India Taiwan Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 95.6% | 90.8% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash and others | 4.4% | 9.2% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | ICICI Prudential Quality | Nippon India Taiwan Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 56.0% | 0.0% |
| Mid Cap | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| Small Cap | 21.8% | 0.0% |
| Foreign stocks | 0.0% | 90.8% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 5.8% | 0.0% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | ICICI Prudential Quality | Nippon India Taiwan Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Semiconductors | 0.0% | 31.5% |
| Electronic Components | 0.0% | 25.1% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 14.3% | 0.0% |
| Semiconductor Materials & Equipment | 0.0% | 11.8% |
| Banks | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| Electronic Equipment & Instruments | 0.0% | 8.2% |
| Aerospace & Defense | 7.1% | 0.0% |
| It - Software | 7.1% | 0.0% |
| Healthcare Services | 6.7% | 0.0% |
| Automobiles | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Communications Equipment | 0.0% | 5.1% |
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 0.0% | 4.8% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
ICICI Prudential Quality vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | ICICI Prudential Quality Fund | Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 1.44% | 1.08% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.85% | 0.80% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 2.51% | 2.36% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.77% | 1.92% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare ICICI Prudential Quality with
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ICICI Prudential Quality Fund and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund?
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund is a Thematic fund, Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund is a Thematic fund, run by ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund and Nippon India Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 0.0%. ICICI Prudential Quality Fund charges 1.44% a year and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund 1.08%.
Which has given higher returns, ICICI Prudential Quality Fund or Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund?
Over 1 year: ICICI Prudential Quality Fund −0.95%, Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund +75.71%. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Quality Fund or Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund?
Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund charges less: 1.08% a year against 1.44%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do ICICI Prudential Quality Fund and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund overlap?
0.0%. They hold 0 of the same securities. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Can I invest in both ICICI Prudential Quality Fund and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund?
Yes. 0.0% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so the two hold mostly different investments.
Who manages ICICI Prudential Quality Fund and Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund?
ICICI Prudential Quality Fund: Masoomi Jhurmarvala. Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund: Kinjal Desai.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.