Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    Bandhan Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund are both Value and Contra funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Bandhan Value Fund (Direct) returned 10.3% a year and UTI Value Fund (Direct) returned 11.7% a year. Bandhan Value Fund charges 0.95% a year and UTI Value Fund 1.35% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 43.3%: they hold 22 of the same securities.

    Bandhan Value Fund

    Value and Contra

    3 year return
    10.3%
    Expense ratio
    0.95%
    NAV
    ₹162.25
    See Bandhan Value Fund

    UTI Value Fund

    Value and Contra

    3 year return
    11.7%
    Expense ratio
    1.35%
    NAV
    ₹173.12
    See UTI Value Fund

    Which is better, Bandhan Value or UTI Value? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • Bandhan Value returned more over 5 years: 11.6% a year against 9.9%.
    • UTI Value returned more over 3 years: 11.7% a year against 10.3%.
    • Bandhan Value costs less: 0.95% a year against 1.35% (Direct plans).
    • Bandhan Value swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 12.9% a year against 13.3%.
    • UTI Value fell less in its worst fall since 02-01-2013: −36.7% against −51.9%.
    • Bandhan Value is the larger fund: ₹9,981 Cr against ₹9,025 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 43.3%: 22 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactBandhan Value FundUTI Value Fund
    Fund houseBandhan Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
    CategoryValue and ContraValue and Contra
    AUM₹9,981 Cr (31-08-2026)₹9,025 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹162.25 (Direct)₹173.12 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)0.95%1.35%
    Expense ratio (Regular)1.99%1.87%
    RiskometerVery HighVery High
    BenchmarkBSE 500 TRINifty 500 TRI
    Launch date07-03-200820-07-2005
    Minimum investment₹1,000Regular Plan-Growth- Rs.5000, Regular Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.5000, Regular Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Growth- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.5000, Direct Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.5000,
    Lock inNoneNone
    Fund managersDaylynn PintoAmit Premchandani FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4
    Exit loadExit Load for units in excess of 10% of the investment,1% will be charged for redemption within 1 year.Exit Load for units in excess of 10% of the investment,1% will be charged for redemption within 1 year.

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    Bandhan Value Fund (Direct)−0.23%−4.28%−1.82%−5.59%+10.34%+11.62%+14.55%
    UTI Value Fund (Direct)−0.22%−6.08%−3.22%−9.06%+11.71%+9.95%+12.87%
    Value and Contra average−2.09%−5.76%−3.23%−5.72%+11.83%+11.08%+12.63%

    Category average: the average of the 30 Value and Contra funds, same plan type.

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: Year-wise Returns

    YearBandhanBandhan ValueUTIUTI Value
    2026to date−6.88%−9.69%
    2025+6.16%+7.71%
    2024+19.30%+24.28%
    2023+34.05%+27.63%
    2022+4.30%+5.04%
    2021+66.24%+31.35%

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds, against BSE 500 TRI, the benchmark of Bandhan Value Fund

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 2,675 of them, one for each trading day from 04-01-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    −20%0%20%40%60%
    Nov 2013
    to
    Nov 2016
    Sept 2015
    to
    Sept 2018
    Jul 2017
    to
    Jul 2020
    May 2019
    to
    May 2022
    Mar 2021
    to
    Mar 2024
    Dec 2022
    to
    Dec 2025
    Bandhan Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)BSE 500 TRI

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighestBeat benchmark
    Bandhan Value8.01.27.313.828.118.123.518.2%18.7%−12.8%49.0%79%
    UTI Value1.53.620.224.529.817.72.714.6%15.1%−5.4%33.2%55%
    BSE 500 TRI1.84.27.936.834.311.63.314.8%14.9%−6.2%33.9%--

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is BSE 500 TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 02-01-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026: 166 instalments, ₹16,60,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    Bandhan ValueBandhan Value Fund (Direct) ₹16,60,000 ₹52,75,133 ₹36,15,133 15.4%
    UTI ValueUTI Value Fund (Direct) ₹16,60,000 ₹43,43,176 ₹26,83,176 12.9%
    ₹0₹20.0 L₹40.0 L₹60.0 L
    2014201620182020202220242026
    Bandhan ValueBandhan Value Fund (Direct)UTI ValueUTI Value Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureBandhan Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+10.34%+11.71%
    Standard deviation12.89%13.31%
    Sharpe ratio0.340.43
    Sortino ratio0.460.59
    Maximum drawdown−17.9% (04-03-2025)−17.2% (07-04-2025)
    Beta0.890.91
    Alpha+0.88%+1.86%

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −60%−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%
    2014201620182020202220242026
    Bandhan Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)BSE 500 TRI
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    Bandhan Value Fund (Direct)−51.9%09-01-201824-03-202003-02-202110 months−9.7%
    UTI Value Fund (Direct)−36.7%07-02-202023-03-202005-11-20207 months−10.7%
    BSE 500 TRI−38.1%17-01-202023-03-202006-11-20207 months−9.4%

    From daily values since 02-01-2013, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%5%10%15%20%25%
    20172019202120232025
    Bandhan Value Fund (Direct)UTI Value Fund (Direct)BSE 500 TRI

    Against BSE 500 TRI

    FundUp captureDown captureTracking error
    Bandhan Value Fund (Direct)110%99%7.86%
    UTI Value Fund (Direct)95%90%3.32%

    From month-end values since 02-01-2013. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Bandhan Value Fund, August 2026; UTI Value Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    43.3%
    Held by both
    22
    Only in Bandhan Value
    40
    Only in UTI Value
    42
    Security% of Bandhan Value% of UTI Value
    HDFC Bank Limited7.81%7.97%
    ICICI Bank Limited4.37%6.26%
    Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited6.30%4.16%
    Axis Bank Limited3.52%3.94%
    Infosys Limited3.52%3.19%
    Reliance Industries Limited6.40%2.50%
    Bharti Airtel Limited2.18%4.23%
    Maruti Suzuki India Limited2.46%1.86%
    Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited2.06%1.48%
    Larsen & Toubro Limited2.23%1.41%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 43.3% means 43.3% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in Bandhan Value Fund

    Security% of fund
    Tata Consultancy Services Limited4.09%
    Jindal Steel Limited1.91%
    IDFC First Bank Limited1.89%
    ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited1.88%
    Aurobindo Pharma Limited1.72%

    Largest holdings only in UTI Value Fund

    Security% of fund
    EQ - STATE BANK OF INDIA3.30%
    EQ - MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD.2.99%
    EQ - TECH MAHINDRA LTD.2.58%
    EQ - POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDI1.88%
    EQ - PHOENIX MILLS LTD1.82%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetBandhan ValueUTI Value
    Equity93.4%99.3%
    Debt0.5%0.3%
    Cash and others6.1%0.4%

    Market cap of stocks

    Market capBandhan ValueUTI Value
    Large Cap59.8%65.6%
    Mid Cap17.9%18.3%
    Small Cap15.7%15.5%

    Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.

    Largest sectors

    SectorBandhan ValueUTI Value
    Banks23.9%28.1%
    IT - Software7.6%8.3%
    Automobiles3.7%8.0%
    Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology4.8%6.6%
    Petroleum Products6.4%2.5%
    Finance6.3%1.5%
    Insurance5.2%1.2%
    Realty0.6%4.5%
    Telecom - Services2.2%4.2%

    The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.

    Bandhan Value vs UTI Value: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeBandhan Value FundUTI Value Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)0.95%1.35%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.62%1.05%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)1.99%1.87%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)1.51%1.51%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    Bandhan Value Fund vs UTI Value Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?

    Both are Value and Contra funds, run by Bandhan Mutual Fund and UTI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 43.3%. Bandhan Value Fund charges 0.95% a year and UTI Value Fund 1.35%.

    Which has given higher returns, Bandhan Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    Over 1 year: Bandhan Value Fund −5.59%, UTI Value Fund −9.06%. Over 3 years: Bandhan Value Fund +10.34% a year, UTI Value Fund +11.71% a year. Over 5 years: Bandhan Value Fund +11.62% a year, UTI Value Fund +9.95% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, Bandhan Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    Bandhan Value Fund charges less: 0.95% a year against 1.35%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund overlap?

    43.3%. They hold 22 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being HDFCBANK, ICICIBANK, KOTAKBANK. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is riskier, Bandhan Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    On SEBI's riskometer, Bandhan Value Fund is rated Very High and UTI Value Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 12.89% and 13.31% a year.

    Which is better for SIP, Bandhan Value Fund or UTI Value Fund?

    Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,65,887 in Bandhan Value Fund (XIRR 8.9% a year) and ₹7,59,479 in UTI Value Fund (XIRR 8.6% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?

    Yes. 43.3% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.

    Who manages Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund?

    Bandhan Value Fund: Daylynn Pinto. UTI Value Fund: Amit Premchandani FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs