UTI Dynamic Term Fund vs UTI - Gilt Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
UTI Dynamic Term Fund is a Dynamic Bond fund and UTI - Gilt Fund is a Gilt fund. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) returned 7.2% a year and UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) returned 6.3% a year. UTI Dynamic Term Fund charges 0.56% a year and UTI - Gilt Fund 0.47% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 46.0%: they hold 4 of the same securities.
UTI Dynamic Term Fund
Dynamic Bond
- 3 year return
- 7.2%
- Expense ratio
- 0.56%
- NAV
- ₹35.40
Which is better, UTI Dynamic Term or UTI - Gilt? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- UTI Dynamic Term returned more over 5 years: 7.5% a year against 5.4%.
- UTI Dynamic Term returned more over 3 years: 7.2% a year against 6.3%.
- UTI - Gilt costs less: 0.47% a year against 0.56% (Direct plans).
- UTI Dynamic Term swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 1.8% a year against 2.6%.
- UTI - Gilt fell less in its worst fall since 03-01-2013: −8.1% against −8.1%.
- UTI - Gilt is the larger fund: ₹415 Cr against ₹396 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 46.0%: 4 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | UTI Dynamic Term Fund | UTI - Gilt Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | UTI Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
| Category | Dynamic Bond | Gilt |
| AUM | ₹396 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹415 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹35.40 (Direct) | ₹67.32 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.56% | 0.47% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 1.28% | 0.85% |
| Riskometer | Moderate | Moderate |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Dynamic Bond A-III Index | CRISIL Dynamic Gilt Index |
| Launch date | 16-06-2010 | 21-01-2002 |
| Minimum investment | Regular Plan-Half-yearly Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Half-yearly Payout of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Growth- Rs.500, Regular Plan-Flexi Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Flexi Payout of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Quarterly | Regular Plan-Growth- Rs.500, Regular Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.20000, Direct Plan-Growth- Rs.500, Direct Plan-Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.20000, Direct Plan-Payout of IDCW- Rs.20000, |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Pankaj Pathak FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4 | Pankaj Pathak FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4 |
| Exit load | Nil | Nil |
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | −0.58% | −0.36% | +1.54% | +3.81% | +7.15% | +7.47% | +6.62% |
| UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) | −1.12% | −1.53% | +0.15% | +3.11% | +6.31% | +5.41% | +6.72% |
| Dynamic Bond average | −0.48% | −0.66% | +1.80% | +3.05% | +6.70% | +5.98% | +6.68% |
| Gilt average | −0.69% | −1.34% | +1.62% | +2.12% | +6.19% | +5.46% | +6.64% |
Category average: the average of the 22 Dynamic Bond funds and the 28 Gilt funds, same plan type.
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: Year-wise Returns
| Year | Dynamic TermUTI Dynamic Term | - GiltUTI - Gilt |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | +3.02% | +2.33% |
| 2025 | +6.92% | +5.35% |
| 2024 | +9.59% | +9.20% |
| 2023 | +7.04% | +6.96% |
| 2022 | +10.78% | +3.23% |
| 2021 | +11.38% | +2.56% |
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 2,618 of them, one for each trading day from 04-01-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct)
to
Nov 2016Sept 2015
to
Sept 2018Jul 2017
to
Jul 2020May 2019
to
May 2022Mar 2021
to
Mar 2024Dec 2022
to
Dec 2025
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI Dynamic Term | 0.0 | 22.9 | 52.9 | 24.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.9% | 8.8% | 1.0% | 14.0% |
| UTI - Gilt | 0.0 | 9.4 | 76.7 | 13.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.1% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 14.8% |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 03-01-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026: 166 instalments, ₹16,60,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI Dynamic TermUTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | ₹16,60,000 | ₹28,11,667 | ₹11,51,667 | 7.3% |
| UTI - GiltUTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) | ₹16,60,000 | ₹27,34,784 | ₹10,74,784 | 6.9% |
UTI Dynamic TermUTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
UTI - GiltUTI - Gilt Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +3.81% | +3.11% |
| Standard deviation | 1.53% | 2.46% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.94 | -0.87 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.23 | -1.18 |
| Maximum drawdown | −1.4% (23-10-2026) | −2.6% (23-10-2026) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +7.15% | +6.31% |
| Standard deviation | 1.76% | 2.63% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.64 | 0.11 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.92 | 0.15 |
| Maximum drawdown | −1.6% (26-08-2025) | −3.2% (26-08-2025) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +7.47% | +5.41% |
| Standard deviation | 3.71% | 2.25% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.45 | -0.17 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.47 | -0.24 |
| Maximum drawdown | −1.6% (26-08-2025) | −3.2% (26-08-2025) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 29-10-2021 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +7.80% | +7.78% |
| Standard deviation | 3.93% | 3.70% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.45 | 0.47 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| Maximum drawdown | −8.1% (10-06-2019) | −8.1% (19-08-2013) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct)
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | −8.1% | 26-12-2018 | 10-06-2019 | 25-06-2020 | 13 months | −1.1% |
| UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct) | −8.1% | 27-05-2013 | 19-08-2013 | 19-05-2014 | 9 months | −2.1% |
From daily values since 03-01-2013, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct)
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct)
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 5-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
UTI Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
UTI - Gilt Fund (Direct)
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: UTI Dynamic Term Fund, September 2026; UTI - Gilt Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 46.0%
- Held by both
- 4
- Only in UTI Dynamic Term
- 12
- Only in UTI - Gilt
- 4
| Security | % of UTI Dynamic Term | % of UTI - Gilt |
|---|---|---|
| 6.90% GSEC MAT - 15/04/2065 | 28.31% | 51.89% |
| 07.71% GSEC Mat- 18/05/2066 | 12.62% | 12.05% |
| 7.24% GSEC MAT- 18/08/2055 | 3.59% | 9.15% |
| 07.30% UTTARAKHAND SGS Mat - 01/10/2032 | 2.12% | 2.03% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 46.0% means 46.0% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in UTI Dynamic Term Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| NCD BHARTI TELECOM LTD. | 6.33% |
| NCD MAHINDRA RURAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD | 6.32% |
| NCD JAMNAGAR UTILITIES AND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED | 6.31% |
| NCD CANFIN HOMES LTD. | 5.06% |
| NCD CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED | 5.02% |
Largest holdings only in UTI - Gilt Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| 6.79% NI GSEC MAT 15/05/2027 | 6.05% |
| 7.18% TN SDL 26/07/2027 | 3.64% |
| 7.77% ANDHRA PRADESH SGS - 10/01/2028 | 1.22% |
| 364 DAYS T-BILL - 04/03/2027 | 0.38% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | UTI Dynamic Term | UTI - Gilt |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Debt | 90.9% | 86.4% |
| Cash and others | 9.1% | 13.6% |
UTI Dynamic Term vs UTI - Gilt: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | UTI Dynamic Term Fund | UTI - Gilt Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.56% | 0.47% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.47% | 0.38% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 1.28% | 0.85% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.10% | 0.72% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare UTI Dynamic Term with
UTI Dynamic Term Fund vs UTI - Gilt Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between UTI Dynamic Term Fund and UTI - Gilt Fund?
UTI Dynamic Term Fund is a Dynamic Bond fund, UTI - Gilt Fund is a Gilt fund, run by UTI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 46.0%. UTI Dynamic Term Fund charges 0.56% a year and UTI - Gilt Fund 0.47%.
Which has given higher returns, UTI Dynamic Term Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?
Over 1 year: UTI Dynamic Term Fund +3.81%, UTI - Gilt Fund +3.11%. Over 3 years: UTI Dynamic Term Fund +7.15% a year, UTI - Gilt Fund +6.31% a year. Over 5 years: UTI Dynamic Term Fund +7.47% a year, UTI - Gilt Fund +5.41% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, UTI Dynamic Term Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?
UTI - Gilt Fund charges less: 0.47% a year against 0.56%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do UTI Dynamic Term Fund and UTI - Gilt Fund overlap?
46.0%. They hold 4 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being 6.90% GSEC MAT - 15/04/2065, 07.71% GSEC Mat- 18/05/2066, 7.24% GSEC MAT- 18/08/2055. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, UTI Dynamic Term Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, UTI Dynamic Term Fund is rated Moderate and UTI - Gilt Fund Moderate. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 1.76% and 2.63% a year.
Which is better for SIP, UTI Dynamic Term Fund or UTI - Gilt Fund?
Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,23,666 in UTI Dynamic Term Fund (XIRR 6.7% a year) and ₹7,00,912 in UTI - Gilt Fund (XIRR 5.4% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both UTI Dynamic Term Fund and UTI - Gilt Fund?
Yes. 46.0% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages UTI Dynamic Term Fund and UTI - Gilt Fund?
UTI Dynamic Term Fund: Pankaj Pathak FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4. UTI - Gilt Fund: Pankaj Pathak FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.