Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund vs Quantum Ethical Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund is a Thematic fund and Quantum Ethical Fund is a Thematic fund. In the year to 30-10-2026, Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) returned −9.4% and Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct) returned −4.3%. Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund charges 0.80% a year and Quantum Ethical Fund 0.90% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 58.4%: they hold 32 of the same securities.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund
Thematic
- 1 year return
- −9.4%
- Expense ratio
- 0.80%
- NAV
- ₹23.30
Which is better, Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy or Quantum Ethical? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Quantum Ethical returned more over 1 year: −4.3% against −9.4%.
- Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy costs less: 0.80% a year against 0.90% (Direct plans).
- Quantum Ethical fell less in its worst fall since 20-12-2024: −16.4% against −17.0%.
- Quantum Ethical is the larger fund: ₹126 Cr against ₹88 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 58.4%: 32 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund | Quantum Ethical Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | Quantum Mutual Fund | Quantum Mutual Fund |
| Category | Thematic | Thematic |
| AUM | ₹88 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹126 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹23.30 (Direct) | ₹9.63 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.80% | 0.90% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 2.24% | 2.33% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 100 ESG TRI | Nifty 500 Shariah TRI |
| Launch date | 12-07-2019 | 20-12-2024 |
| Minimum investment | ₹500 | ₹500 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Chirag Mehta, Rajorshi Palit | Chirag Mehta |
| Exit load | For units more than 10% of the investments, an exit load of 1% if redeemed within 365 days. | For units in excess of 10% of the investment 1% will be charged for redemption within 365 Days |
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | −1.69% | −7.65% | −2.14% | −9.41% | +7.36% | +6.21% | -- |
| Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct) | −1.83% | −5.22% | +1.05% | −4.27% | -- | -- | -- |
| Thematic average | −2.09% | −4.52% | +0.86% | −1.22% | -- | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 235 Thematic funds, same plan type.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: Year-wise Returns
| Year | ESG Best In Class StrategyQuantum ESG Best In Class Strategy | EthicalQuantum Ethical |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −9.20% | −2.53% |
| 2025 | +3.18% | −1.20% |
| 2024 | +16.54% | -- |
| 2023 | +25.83% | -- |
| 2022 | −3.09% | -- |
| 2021 | +31.48% | -- |
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against NIFTY100 ESG TRI, the benchmark of Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund
Rolling returns
Every 1-year holding period, 210 of them, one for each trading day from 22-12-2025 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
to
Jan 2026Mar 2025
to
Mar 2026May 2025
to
May 2026Jun 2025
to
Jun 2026Aug 2025
to
Aug 2026Oct 2025
to
Oct 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy | 58.1 | 32.9 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.1% | −1.5% | −11.4% | 9.4% | 0% |
| Quantum Ethical | 58.6 | 31.0 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.0% | −0.6% | −7.1% | 7.4% | 20% |
| NIFTY100 ESG TRI | 27.1 | 31.4 | 15.2 | 20.5 | 5.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.4% | 3.2% | −7.7% | 16.4% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is NIFTY100 ESG TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 20-12-2024. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-12-2024 to 30-10-2026: 23 instalments, ₹2,30,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum ESG Best In Class StrategyQuantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | ₹2,30,000 | ₹2,18,572 | −₹11,428 | −5.0% |
| Quantum EthicalQuantum Ethical Fund (Direct) | ₹2,30,000 | ₹2,28,157 | −₹1,843 | −0.8% |
Quantum ESG Best In Class StrategyQuantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
Quantum EthicalQuantum Ethical Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −9.41% | −4.27% |
| Standard deviation | 15.07% | 14.29% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.97 | -0.67 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.28 | -0.89 |
| Maximum drawdown | −16.5% (30-03-2026) | −14.3% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| Alpha | −3.75% | +2.34% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +12.28% | −2.01% |
| Standard deviation | 15.36% | 13.40% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.47 | -0.57 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.63 | -0.77 |
| Maximum drawdown | −33.1% (23-03-2020) | −16.4% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | -- | 0.89 |
| Alpha | -- | +1.88% |
From daily NAVs, 12-07-2019 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | −17.0% | 18-09-2025 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −10.8% |
| Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct) | −16.4% | 19-09-2025 | 30-03-2026 | 03-08-2026 | 4 months | −7.6% |
| NIFTY100 ESG TRI | −15.4% | 07-01-2026 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −8.8% |
From daily values since 20-12-2024, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct)
Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
Against NIFTY100 ESG TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund (Direct) | 82% | 107% | 4.29% |
| Quantum Ethical Fund (Direct) | 73% | 90% | 6.18% |
From month-end values since 20-12-2024. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund, September 2026; Quantum Ethical Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 58.4%
- Held by both
- 32
- Only in Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy
- 19
- Only in Quantum Ethical
- 9
| Security | % of Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy | % of Quantum Ethical |
|---|---|---|
| Marico Ltd | 3.76% | 4.51% |
| TVS Motor Company Ltd | 6.32% | 3.47% |
| VA Tech Wabag Ltd | 3.24% | 4.06% |
| Persistent Systems Ltd | 3.39% | 3.13% |
| Bosch Ltd | 3.02% | 2.97% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd | 2.16% | 2.51% |
| Hitachi Energy India Ltd | 2.15% | 3.06% |
| ION Exchange (India) Ltd | 2.32% | 2.09% |
| Infosys Ltd | 2.07% | 2.86% |
| LT Foods Ltd | 2.03% | 2.18% |
| Eicher Motors Ltd | 2.02% | 2.99% |
| Dr. Lal Path Labs Ltd | 1.98% | 3.10% |
| Maruti Suzuki India Ltd | 1.91% | 3.14% |
| Bajaj Auto Ltd | 1.84% | 3.04% |
| HCL Technologies Ltd | 1.81% | 2.52% |
| Computer Age Management Services Ltd | 1.81% | 2.27% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd | 1.69% | 2.22% |
| Castrol India Ltd | 1.62% | 3.65% |
| Elgi Equipments Ltd | 1.60% | 2.36% |
| Havells India Ltd | 1.48% | 1.90% |
| Sundram Fasteners Ltd | 1.45% | 2.55% |
| Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Ltd | 1.41% | 1.88% |
| Hero MotoCorp Ltd | 1.51% | 1.38% |
| Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd | 1.33% | 2.48% |
| Voltas Ltd | 1.25% | 1.64% |
| ABB India Ltd | 1.23% | 2.49% |
| Hyundai Motor India Ltd | 1.14% | 2.45% |
| Vinati Organics Ltd | 1.00% | 1.83% |
| Safari Industries (India) Ltd | 1.05% | 0.98% |
| Eureka Forbes Ltd | 0.90% | 1.05% |
| Tata Chemicals Ltd | 1.00% | 0.78% |
| Symphony Ltd | 0.73% | 1.62% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 58.4% means 58.4% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Ltd | 4.05% |
| The Federal Bank Ltd | 3.58% |
| Bajaj Finance Ltd | 2.91% |
| HDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd | 2.76% |
| ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd | 2.20% |
Largest holdings only in Quantum Ethical Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd | 2.97% |
| Coforge Ltd | 1.33% |
| Tech Mahindra Ltd | 1.33% |
| GMM Pfaudler Ltd | 1.13% |
| Borosil Ltd | 1.07% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy | Quantum Ethical |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 98.5% | 90.3% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash and others | 1.5% | 9.7% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy | Quantum Ethical |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 40.3% | 35.0% |
| Mid Cap | 27.1% | 18.9% |
| Small Cap | 31.1% | 36.4% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy | Quantum Ethical |
|---|---|---|
| Automobiles | 16.9% | 19.0% |
| IT - Software | 9.4% | 14.4% |
| Consumer Durables | 11.1% | 12.4% |
| Banks | 10.4% | 0.0% |
| Auto Components | 4.5% | 8.5% |
| Insurance | 6.9% | 0.0% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| Other Utilities | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Healthcare Services | 5.9% | 3.1% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Quantum Ethical: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund | Quantum Ethical Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.80% | 0.90% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.63% | 0.64% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 2.24% | 2.33% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 1.85% | 1.85% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy with
- Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity
- Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs HDFC Defence
- Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs HDFC Pharma and Healthcare
- Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs SBI Healthcare Opportunities
- Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy vs Aditya Birla Sun Life International Equity
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund vs Quantum Ethical Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund and Quantum Ethical Fund?
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund is a Thematic fund, Quantum Ethical Fund is a Thematic fund, run by Quantum Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 58.4%. Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund charges 0.80% a year and Quantum Ethical Fund 0.90%.
Which has given higher returns, Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund or Quantum Ethical Fund?
Over 1 year: Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund −9.41%, Quantum Ethical Fund −4.27%. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund or Quantum Ethical Fund?
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund charges less: 0.80% a year against 0.90%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund and Quantum Ethical Fund overlap?
58.4%. They hold 32 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being MARICO, TVSMOTOR, WABAG. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund or Quantum Ethical Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund is rated Very High and Quantum Ethical Fund Very High. Over 1 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 15.07% and 14.29% a year.
Can I invest in both Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund and Quantum Ethical Fund?
Yes. 58.4% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund and Quantum Ethical Fund?
Quantum ESG Best In Class Strategy Fund: Chirag Mehta, Rajorshi Palit. Quantum Ethical Fund: Chirag Mehta.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.