quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund vs quant Teck Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund is a Thematic fund and quant Teck Fund is a Thematic fund. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) returned 16.3% a year and quant Teck Fund (Direct) returned 5.1% a year. quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund charges 1.79% a year and quant Teck Fund 2.28% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 42.6%: they hold 15 of the same securities.
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund
Thematic
- 3 year return
- 16.3%
- Expense ratio
- 1.79%
- NAV
- ₹40.05
Which is better, quant ESG Integration Strategy or quant Teck? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- quant ESG Integration Strategy returned more over 3 years: 16.3% a year against 5.1%.
- quant ESG Integration Strategy returned more over 1 year: 10.8% against −7.8%.
- quant ESG Integration Strategy costs less: 1.79% a year against 2.28% (Direct plans).
- quant ESG Integration Strategy swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 16.5% a year against 19.5%.
- quant ESG Integration Strategy fell less in its worst fall since 12-09-2023: −25.1% against −41.9%.
- quant ESG Integration Strategy is the larger fund: ₹328 Cr against ₹243 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 42.6%: 15 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund | quant Teck Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | quant Mutual Fund | quant Mutual Fund |
| Category | Thematic | Thematic |
| AUM | ₹328 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹243 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹40.05 (Direct) | ₹11.14 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.79% | 2.28% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 3.33% | 3.81% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 100 ESG TRI | Nifty IT TRI |
| Launch date | 11-05-2020 | 09-11-2023 |
| Minimum investment | ₹5,000 | ₹5,000 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Sandeep Tandon, Sanjeev Sharma, Ankit Pande, Sameer Kate, Yug Tibrewal, Ayusha Kumbhat | Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma |
| Exit load | Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days. | Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days. |
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | −3.42% | −3.24% | +9.12% | +10.83% | +16.34% | +17.09% | -- |
| quant Teck Fund (Direct) | +1.67% | −4.80% | +9.02% | −7.82% | +5.12% | -- | -- |
| Thematic average | −2.09% | −4.52% | +0.86% | −1.22% | +13.76% | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 235 Thematic funds, same plan type.
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: Year-wise Returns
| Year | ESG Integration Strategyquant ESG Integration Strategy | Teckquant Teck |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | +10.44% | −4.73% |
| 2025 | +3.75% | −14.81% |
| 2024 | +19.18% | +25.22% |
| 2023 | +27.47% | -- |
| 2022 | +17.93% | -- |
| 2021 | +66.38% | -- |
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against NIFTY100 ESG TRI, the benchmark of quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 30 of them, one for each trading day from 15-09-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct)
quant Teck Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
to
Sept 2026Sept 2023
to
Sept 2026Oct 2023
to
Oct 2026Oct 2023
to
Oct 2026Oct 2023
to
Oct 2026Oct 2023
to
Oct 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| quant ESG Integration Strategy | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16.8% | 16.6% | 16.0% | 18.2% | 100% |
| quant Teck | 0.0 | 80.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.2% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 6.0% | 0% |
| NIFTY100 ESG TRI | 0.0 | 0.0 | 76.7 | 23.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.4% | 9.3% | 8.1% | 10.5% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is NIFTY100 ESG TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 12-09-2023. Past returns do not promise future returns.
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 01-09-2023 to 30-10-2026: 38 instalments, ₹3,80,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| quant ESG Integration Strategyquant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | ₹3,80,000 | ₹4,44,268 | ₹64,268 | 9.9% |
| quant Teckquant Teck Fund (Direct) | ₹3,80,000 | ₹3,63,149 | −₹16,851 | −2.8% |
quant ESG Integration Strategyquant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct)
quant Teckquant Teck Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | quant Teck Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +10.83% | −7.82% |
| Standard deviation | 18.09% | 20.09% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | -0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.43 | -0.88 |
| Maximum drawdown | −15.9% (30-03-2026) | −31.3% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.02 | 0.45 |
| Alpha | +16.79% | −7.27% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | quant Teck Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +16.34% | +5.12% |
| Standard deviation | 16.47% | 19.48% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | -0.05 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.86 | -0.06 |
| Maximum drawdown | −25.1% (03-03-2025) | −41.9% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 0.99 | 0.48 |
| Alpha | +5.84% | −0.03% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | quant Teck Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +26.04% | +3.45% |
| Standard deviation | 17.22% | 19.22% |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.20 | -0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.66 | -0.19 |
| Maximum drawdown | −25.1% (03-03-2025) | −41.9% (30-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.01 | 0.48 |
| Alpha | +12.77% | −0.54% |
From daily NAVs, 06-11-2020 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct)
quant Teck Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | −25.1% | 27-09-2024 | 03-03-2025 | 26-05-2026 | 15 months | −8.1% |
| quant Teck Fund (Direct) | −41.9% | 13-09-2024 | 30-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −22.2% |
| NIFTY100 ESG TRI | −17.5% | 27-09-2024 | 04-03-2025 | 20-11-2025 | 9 months | −8.8% |
From daily values since 12-09-2023, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct)
quant Teck Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct)
quant Teck Fund (Direct)
NIFTY100 ESG TRI
Against NIFTY100 ESG TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (Direct) | 117% | 91% | 12.63% |
| quant Teck Fund (Direct) | 112% | 144% | 16.49% |
From month-end values since 12-09-2023. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund, September 2026; quant Teck Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 42.6%
- Held by both
- 15
- Only in quant ESG Integration Strategy
- 8
- Only in quant Teck
- 7
| Security | % of quant ESG Integration Strategy | % of quant Teck |
|---|---|---|
| TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10 | 14.83% | 16.00% |
| Indus Towers Limited | 9.48% | 6.57% |
| HFCL Limited | 7.80% | 6.28% |
| Black Box Limited | 4.03% | 7.58% |
| Aequs Ltd | 3.73% | 8.22% |
| BLACKBUCK LIMITED | 1.21% | 0.87% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 05-Nov-2026 | 0.76% | 0.82% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 19-Nov-2026 | 0.76% | 0.82% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 27-Nov-2026 | 0.76% | 0.82% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 03-Dec-2026 | 0.76% | 0.82% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 10-Dec-2026 | 0.75% | 0.81% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 17-Dec-2026 | 0.75% | 0.81% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 24-Dec-2026 | 0.75% | 0.81% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 22-Oct-2026 | 0.61% | 0.82% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 15-Oct-2026 | 0.61% | 0.41% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 42.6% means 42.6% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Adani Enterprises Limited | 8.21% |
| Adani Green Energy Limited | 7.53% |
| LG Electronics India Limited | 7.45% |
| Piramal Finance Ltd | 7.16% |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd | 6.16% |
Largest holdings only in quant Teck Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Bharti Airtel Limited | 8.88% |
| Sonata Software Limited | 8.88% |
| Hexaware Technologies Limited | 7.34% |
| HCL Technologies Limited | 6.58% |
| Mphasis Ltd | 5.16% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | quant ESG Integration Strategy | quant Teck |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 74.4% | 74.2% |
| Debt | 21.9% | 22.9% |
| Cash and others | 3.7% | 2.9% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | quant ESG Integration Strategy | quant Teck |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 25.2% | 22.0% |
| Mid Cap | 26.4% | 8.0% |
| Small Cap | 22.8% | 44.2% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | quant ESG Integration Strategy | quant Teck |
|---|---|---|
| N.A. | 0.0% | 74.2% |
| Other | 11.2% | 0.0% |
| 72.1 | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| 65.4 | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| 70.7 | 7.8% | 0.0% |
| 71.2 | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| 74.8 | 7.2% | 0.0% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
quant ESG Integration Strategy vs quant Teck: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund | quant Teck Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 1.79% | 2.28% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.80% | 0.80% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 3.33% | 3.81% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 2.10% | 2.10% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare quant ESG Integration Strategy with
- quant ESG Integration Strategy vs Nippon India Taiwan Equity
- quant ESG Integration Strategy vs HDFC Defence
- quant ESG Integration Strategy vs HDFC Pharma and Healthcare
- quant ESG Integration Strategy vs SBI Healthcare Opportunities
- quant ESG Integration Strategy vs Aditya Birla Sun Life International Equity
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund vs quant Teck Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund and quant Teck Fund?
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund is a Thematic fund, quant Teck Fund is a Thematic fund, run by quant Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 42.6%. quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund charges 1.79% a year and quant Teck Fund 2.28%.
Which has given higher returns, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund or quant Teck Fund?
Over 1 year: quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund +10.83%, quant Teck Fund −7.82%. Over 3 years: quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund +16.34% a year, quant Teck Fund +5.12% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund or quant Teck Fund?
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund charges less: 1.79% a year against 2.28%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund and quant Teck Fund overlap?
42.6%. They hold 15 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10, INDUSTOWER, HFCL-BE. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund or quant Teck Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund is rated Very High and quant Teck Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 16.47% and 19.48% a year.
Which is better for SIP, quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund or quant Teck Fund?
Over the last 3 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 03-10-2023 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹4,28,806 in quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund (XIRR 9.6% a year) and ₹3,52,028 in quant Teck Fund (XIRR -3.1% a year). Both received 37 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund and quant Teck Fund?
Yes. 42.6% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund and quant Teck Fund?
quant ESG Integration Strategy Fund: Sandeep Tandon, Sanjeev Sharma, Ankit Pande, Sameer Kate, Yug Tibrewal, Ayusha Kumbhat. quant Teck Fund: Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.