Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    quant BFSI Fund vs quant Quantamental Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    quant BFSI Fund is a Thematic fund and quant Quantamental Fund is a Thematic fund. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, quant BFSI Fund (Direct) returned 17.6% a year and quant Quantamental Fund (Direct) returned 14.4% a year. quant BFSI Fund charges 2.03% a year and quant Quantamental Fund 1.56% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 35.6%: they hold 14 of the same securities.

    quant BFSI Fund

    Thematic

    3 year return
    17.6%
    Expense ratio
    2.03%
    NAV
    ₹19.14
    See quant BFSI Fund

    quant Quantamental Fund

    Thematic

    3 year return
    14.4%
    Expense ratio
    1.56%
    NAV
    ₹25.36
    See quant Quantamental Fund

    Which is better, quant BFSI or quant Quantamental? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • quant BFSI returned more over 3 years: 17.6% a year against 14.4%.
    • quant Quantamental returned more over 1 year: 2.1% against −0.3%.
    • quant Quantamental costs less: 1.56% a year against 2.03% (Direct plans).
    • quant Quantamental swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 17.1% a year against 19.0%.
    • quant BFSI fell less in its worst fall since 21-06-2023: −22.3% against −23.3%.
    • quant Quantamental holds more in large companies: 47.9% of the fund in large caps against 21.8%.
    • quant Quantamental is the larger fund: ₹1,547 Cr against ₹894 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 35.6%: 14 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    Factquant BFSI Fundquant Quantamental Fund
    Fund housequant Mutual Fundquant Mutual Fund
    CategoryThematicThematic
    AUM₹894 Cr (30-09-2026)₹1,547 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹19.14 (Direct)₹25.36 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)2.03%1.56%
    Expense ratio (Regular)3.59%2.89%
    RiskometerVery HighVery High
    BenchmarkNifty Financial Services TRINifty 200 TRI
    Launch date06-08-202430-04-2021
    Minimum investment₹5,000₹5,000
    Lock inNoneNone
    Fund managersSandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev SharmaSandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma
    Exit loadExit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days.Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days.

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    quant BFSI Fund (Direct)−8.20%−10.98%−2.68%−0.26%+17.63%----
    quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)−2.15%−6.63%−1.71%+2.09%+14.36%+18.11%--
    Thematic average−2.09%−4.52%+0.86%−1.22%+13.76%+11.62%--

    Category average: the average of the 235 Thematic funds, same plan type.

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: Year-wise Returns

    YearBFSIquant BFSIQuantamentalquant Quantamental
    2026to date−5.13%+0.24%
    2025+26.50%+7.88%
    2024+14.77%+15.46%
    2023--+39.48%
    2022--+28.96%

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty Financial Services TRI, the benchmark of quant BFSI Fund

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 89 of them, one for each trading day from 22-06-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    0%5%10%15%20%25%30%
    Jul 2023
    to
    Jul 2026
    Jul 2023
    to
    Jul 2026
    Aug 2023
    to
    Aug 2026
    Sept 2023
    to
    Sept 2026
    Sept 2023
    to
    Sept 2026
    Oct 2023
    to
    Oct 2026
    quant BFSI Fund (Direct)quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)Nifty Financial Services TRI

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighestBeat benchmark
    quant BFSI0.00.00.00.014.647.238.223.8%23.7%17.6%28.8%100%
    quant Quantamental0.00.00.025.866.37.90.016.9%17.2%13.6%20.7%100%
    Nifty Financial Services TRI0.00.044.955.10.00.00.010.2%10.4%7.9%12.2%--

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is Nifty Financial Services TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 21-06-2023. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 21-06-2023 to 30-10-2026: 41 instalments, ₹4,10,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    quant BFSIquant BFSI Fund (Direct) ₹4,10,000 ₹4,89,404 ₹79,404 10.4%
    quant Quantamentalquant Quantamental Fund (Direct) ₹4,10,000 ₹4,58,901 ₹48,901 6.6%
    ₹0₹2.0 L₹4.0 L₹6.0 L
    202420252026
    quant BFSIquant BFSI Fund (Direct)quant Quantamentalquant Quantamental Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    Measurequant BFSI Fund (Direct)quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+17.63%+14.36%
    Standard deviation19.02%17.12%
    Sharpe ratio0.610.49
    Sortino ratio0.830.67
    Maximum drawdown−22.3% (03-03-2025)−23.3% (03-03-2025)
    Beta0.871.07
    Alpha+8.35%+4.10%

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%
    202420252026
    quant BFSI Fund (Direct)quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)Nifty Financial Services TRI
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    quant BFSI Fund (Direct)−22.3%27-09-202403-03-202514-07-20254 months−13.8%
    quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)−23.3%27-09-202403-03-202526-05-202615 months−8.8%
    Nifty Financial Services TRI−17.3%18-02-202630-03-2026Not yet--−12.4%

    From daily values since 21-06-2023, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%5%10%15%20%
    quant BFSI Fund (Direct)quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)Nifty Financial Services TRI

    Against Nifty Financial Services TRI

    FundUp captureDown captureTracking error
    quant BFSI Fund (Direct)106%28%15.57%
    quant Quantamental Fund (Direct)110%68%13.42%

    From month-end values since 21-06-2023. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: quant BFSI Fund, September 2026; quant Quantamental Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    35.6%
    Held by both
    14
    Only in quant BFSI
    8
    Only in quant Quantamental
    10
    Security% of quant BFSI% of quant Quantamental
    Piramal Finance Ltd9.05%8.87%
    TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 108.17%21.90%
    Life Insurance Corporation Of India9.52%6.61%
    ICICI Prudential AMC Ltd10.28%4.58%
    91 Days Treasury Bill 22-Oct-20260.78%0.84%
    91 Days Treasury Bill 29-Oct-20260.78%0.77%
    91 Days Treasury Bill 27-Nov-20260.78%0.77%
    91 Days Treasury Bill 10-Dec-20260.78%0.77%
    91 Days Treasury Bill 24-Dec-20260.77%0.77%
    91 Days Treasury Bill 05-Nov-20260.72%0.80%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 35.6% means 35.6% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in quant BFSI Fund

    Security% of fund
    Capri Global Capital Limited9.60%
    LIC Housing Finance Ltd9.18%
    Nippon Life India Asset Management Ltd9.12%
    Manappuram Finance Ltd8.67%
    Karnataka Bank Ltd5.24%

    Largest holdings only in quant Quantamental Fund

    Security% of fund
    Adani Enterprises Limited9.07%
    Adani Green Energy Limited9.04%
    Aurobindo Pharma Limited7.27%
    Indus Towers Limited5.49%
    Zydus Lifesciences Limited4.52%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    Assetquant BFSIquant Quantamental
    Equity78.7%70.5%
    Debt15.6%29.7%
    Cash and others5.6%-0.2%

    Market cap of stocks

    Market capquant BFSIquant Quantamental
    Large Cap21.8%47.9%
    Mid Cap19.3%20.7%
    Small Cap37.6%1.9%

    Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.

    Largest sectors

    Sectorquant BFSIquant Quantamental
    N.A.78.7%70.5%

    The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.

    quant BFSI vs quant Quantamental: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    Chargequant BFSI Fundquant Quantamental Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)2.03%1.56%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.68%0.69%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)3.59%2.89%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)2.00%1.82%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    quant BFSI Fund vs quant Quantamental Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between quant BFSI Fund and quant Quantamental Fund?

    quant BFSI Fund is a Thematic fund, quant Quantamental Fund is a Thematic fund, run by quant Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 35.6%. quant BFSI Fund charges 2.03% a year and quant Quantamental Fund 1.56%.

    Which has given higher returns, quant BFSI Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?

    Over 1 year: quant BFSI Fund −0.26%, quant Quantamental Fund +2.09%. Over 3 years: quant BFSI Fund +17.63% a year, quant Quantamental Fund +14.36% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, quant BFSI Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?

    quant Quantamental Fund charges less: 1.56% a year against 2.03%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do quant BFSI Fund and quant Quantamental Fund overlap?

    35.6%. They hold 14 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being PIRAMALFIN, TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10, LICI. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is riskier, quant BFSI Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?

    On SEBI's riskometer, quant BFSI Fund is rated Very High and quant Quantamental Fund Very High. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 19.02% and 17.12% a year.

    Which is better for SIP, quant BFSI Fund or quant Quantamental Fund?

    Over the last 3 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 03-10-2023 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹4,18,227 in quant BFSI Fund (XIRR 7.9% a year) and ₹3,96,320 in quant Quantamental Fund (XIRR 4.4% a year). Both received 37 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both quant BFSI Fund and quant Quantamental Fund?

    Yes. 35.6% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so some of the two investments would move together.

    Who manages quant BFSI Fund and quant Quantamental Fund?

    quant BFSI Fund: Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma. quant Quantamental Fund: Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs