NJ Value Fund vs Quant Value Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund are both Value and Contra funds. NJ Value Fund charges 1.60% a year and Quant Value Fund 0.92% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 1.4%: they hold 1 of the same security.
Which is better, NJ Value or Quant Value? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Quant Value costs less: 0.92% a year against 1.60% (Direct plans).
- NJ Value fell less in its worst fall since 03-08-2026: −10.7% against −13.1%.
- Their portfolios overlap 1.4%: 1 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | NJ Value Fund | Quant Value Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | NJ Mutual Fund | quant Mutual Fund |
| Category | Value and Contra | Value and Contra |
| AUM | Not available | ₹1,917 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹9.11 (Direct) | ₹22.01 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 1.60% | 0.92% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 3.39% | 2.46% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 500 TRI | Nifty 500 TRI |
| Launch date | 30-07-2026 | 11-06-2023 |
| Minimum investment | ₹500 | ₹5,000 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Dhaval Patel, Viral Shah, Jaimin Ilavia | Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma |
| Exit load | Nil | Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days. |
NJ Value vs Quant Value: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJ Value Fund (Direct) | −1.19% | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Quant Value Fund (Direct) | −5.26% | −8.30% | −3.73% | +3.16% | +19.06% | -- | -- |
| Value and Contra average | −2.09% | −5.76% | −3.23% | −5.72% | +11.83% | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 30 Value and Contra funds, same plan type.
NJ Value vs Quant Value: Year-wise Returns
| Year | NJNJ Value | QuantQuant Value | Nifty 500 TRI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | -- | +4.09% | −7.51% |
| 2025 | -- | +1.39% | +7.76% |
| 2024 | -- | +25.90% | +16.24% |
| 2023 | -- | +39.00% | +26.91% |
| 2022 | -- | +17.29% | +4.25% |
NJ Value vs Quant Value: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against Nifty 500 TRI, the benchmark of both
NJ Value vs Quant Value: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | NJ Value Fund (Direct) | Quant Value Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −33.20% | +17.32% |
| Standard deviation | 11.23% | 19.26% |
| Sharpe ratio | -3.42 | 0.60 |
| Sortino ratio | -3.90 | 0.80 |
| Maximum drawdown | −10.7% (23-10-2026) | −24.0% (03-03-2025) |
| Beta | 0.94 | 1.16 |
| Alpha | −6.42% | +7.33% |
From daily NAVs, 03-08-2026 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
NJ Value Fund (Direct)
Quant Value Fund (Direct)
Nifty 500 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJ Value Fund (Direct) | −10.7% | 05-08-2026 | 23-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −9.3% |
| Quant Value Fund (Direct) | −13.1% | 28-08-2026 | 23-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −11.1% |
| Nifty 500 TRI | −9.9% | 03-08-2026 | 23-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −7.9% |
From daily values since 03-08-2026, the first day every fund has.
NJ Value vs Quant Value: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: NJ Value Fund, September 2026; Quant Value Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 1.4%
- Held by both
- 1
- Only in NJ Value
- 74
- Only in Quant Value
- 32
| Security | % of NJ Value | % of Quant Value |
|---|---|---|
| LIC Housing Finance Limited | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 1.4% means 1.4% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in NJ Value Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Redington Limited | 1.81% |
| The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited | 1.66% |
| Bosch Limited | 1.64% |
| Samvardhana Motherson International Limited | 1.55% |
| Jubilant Foodworks Limited | 1.49% |
Largest holdings only in Quant Value Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10 | 15.73% |
| Adani Enterprises Limited | 9.32% |
| Piramal Finance Ltd | 9.13% |
| Adani Green Energy Limited | 8.18% |
| Indus Towers Limited | 7.31% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | NJ Value | Quant Value |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 99.4% | 76.7% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 23.4% |
| Cash and others | 0.6% | -0.1% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | NJ Value | Quant Value |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 40.9% | 40.4% |
| Mid Cap | 34.3% | 16.2% |
| Small Cap | 24.1% | 20.1% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | NJ Value | Quant Value |
|---|---|---|
| N.A. | 0.0% | 76.7% |
| Banks | 12.2% | 0.0% |
| IT - Software | 8.7% | 0.0% |
| Finance | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| Auto Components | 8.3% | 0.0% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| Automobiles | 4.0% | 0.0% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
NJ Value vs Quant Value: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | NJ Value Fund | Quant Value Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 1.60% | 0.92% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.58% | 0.48% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 3.39% | 2.46% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 2.10% | 1.78% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
NJ Value Fund vs Quant Value Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund?
Both are Value and Contra funds, run by NJ Mutual Fund and quant Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 1.4%. NJ Value Fund charges 1.60% a year and Quant Value Fund 0.92%.
Which has the lower expense ratio, NJ Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
Quant Value Fund charges less: 0.92% a year against 1.60%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund overlap?
1.4%. They hold 1 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being LICHSGFIN. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, NJ Value Fund or Quant Value Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, NJ Value Fund is rated Very High and Quant Value Fund Very High. Over their common history, the standard deviation of daily returns was 11.23% and 19.26% a year.
Can I invest in both NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund?
Yes. 1.4% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so the two hold mostly different investments.
Who manages NJ Value Fund and Quant Value Fund?
NJ Value Fund: Dhaval Patel, Viral Shah, Jaimin Ilavia. Quant Value Fund: Sandeep Tandon, Ankit Pande, Varun Pattani, Ayusha Kumbhat, Yug Tibrewal, Sameer Kate, Sanjeev Sharma.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.