Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund are both Banking & PSU funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct) returned 6.9% a year and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct) returned 7.5% a year. Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund charges 0.39% a year and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund 0.24% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 0.8%: they hold 2 of the same securities.

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund

    Banking & PSU

    3 year return
    6.9%
    Expense ratio
    0.39%
    NAV
    ₹22.84
    See Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund

    UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Banking & PSU

    3 year return
    7.5%
    Expense ratio
    0.24%
    NAV
    ₹24.15
    See UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Which is better, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt or UTI Banking & PSU Debt? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • UTI Banking & PSU Debt returned more over 5 years: 7.8% a year against 6.1%.
    • UTI Banking & PSU Debt returned more over 3 years: 7.5% a year against 6.9%.
    • UTI Banking & PSU Debt costs less: 0.24% a year against 0.39% (Direct plans).
    • UTI Banking & PSU Debt swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 0.8% a year against 1.2%.
    • Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt fell less in its worst fall since 18-05-2015: −3.2% against −6.7%.
    • Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt is the larger fund: ₹5,057 Cr against ₹1,448 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 0.8%: 2 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactNippon India Banking and PSU Debt FundUTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund
    Fund houseNippon India Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
    CategoryBanking & PSUBanking & PSU
    AUM₹5,057 Cr (30-09-2026)₹1,448 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹22.84 (Direct)₹24.15 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)0.39%0.24%
    Expense ratio (Regular)0.78%0.47%
    RiskometerModerateLow to Moderate
    BenchmarkCRISIL Banking and PSU Debt A-II IndexNIFTY Banking & PSU Debt Index A-II
    Launch date15-05-201503-02-2014
    Minimum investment₹5,000Regular Plan-Monthly Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Monthly Payout of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Half-yearly Reinvestment of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Half-yearly Payout of IDCW- Rs.20000, Regular Plan-Growth- Rs.500, Direct Plan-Growth
    Lock inNoneNone
    Fund managersPranay Sinha, Vivek SharmaAnurag Mittal FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4
    Exit loadNilNil

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)−0.28%−0.10%+2.36%+3.76%+6.88%+6.13%+7.10%
    UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)+0.29%+1.41%+3.21%+5.74%+7.47%+7.79%+6.46%
    Banking & PSU average−0.21%+0.14%+2.36%+4.04%+6.88%+6.22%+6.95%

    Category average: the average of the 19 Banking & PSU funds, same plan type.

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: Year-wise Returns

    YearNippon India Banking andNippon India Banking and PSU DebtUTI Banking &UTI Banking & PSU Debt
    2026to date+3.17%+4.86%
    2025+7.71%+8.04%
    2024+8.28%+7.92%
    2023+7.25%+7.01%
    2022+3.65%+10.57%
    2021+4.34%+2.95%

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 2,046 of them, one for each trading day from 18-05-2018 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    0%2%4%6%8%10%
    Jan 2016
    to
    Jan 2019
    Jun 2017
    to
    Jun 2020
    Dec 2018
    to
    Dec 2021
    May 2020
    to
    May 2023
    Oct 2021
    to
    Oct 2024
    Feb 2023
    to
    Feb 2026
    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighest
    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt0.01.998.10.00.00.00.07.5%7.7%4.9%9.9%
    UTI Banking & PSU Debt0.031.568.50.00.00.00.06.5%7.2%3.5%9.8%

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 18-05-2015. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 18-05-2015 to 30-10-2026: 138 instalments, ₹13,80,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    Nippon India Banking and PSU DebtNippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct) ₹13,80,000 ₹20,84,753 ₹7,04,753 6.9%
    UTI Banking & PSU DebtUTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct) ₹13,80,000 ₹20,68,275 ₹6,88,275 6.8%
    ₹0₹5.0 L₹10.0 L₹15.0 L₹20.0 L₹25.0 L
    201620182020202220242026
    Nippon India Banking and PSU DebtNippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)UTI Banking & PSU DebtUTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureNippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+6.88%+7.47%
    Standard deviation1.20%0.75%
    Sharpe ratio0.711.92
    Sortino ratio1.043.16
    Maximum drawdown−0.7% (23-10-2026)−0.4% (13-06-2025)
    Beta----
    Alpha----

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −8%−6%−4%−2%0%
    201620182020202220242026
    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)−3.2%09-03-202023-03-202027-03-20204 days−0.6%
    UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)−6.7%02-04-201930-04-201907-02-20209 months0.0%

    From daily values since 18-05-2015, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%1%2%3%4%5%
    20192020202120222023202420252026
    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (Direct)UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund, September 2026; UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    0.8%
    Held by both
    2
    Only in Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt
    105
    Only in UTI Banking & PSU Debt
    40
    Security% of Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt% of UTI Banking & PSU Debt
    7.59% Power Finance Corporation Limited0.49%1.72%
    Corporate Debt Market Development Fund Class A20.34%0.26%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 0.8% means 0.8% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund

    Security% of fund
    7.61% Government of India4.03%
    7.48% National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development3.54%
    Small Industries Dev Bank of India3.47%
    7.68% National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development3.45%
    7.59% National Housing Bank2.57%

    Largest holdings only in UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Security% of fund
    CD - CANARA BANK - 28/01/20277.77%
    CD - UNION BANK OF INDIA - 19/01/20276.77%
    CD - ICICI BANK LTD - 25/03/20275.02%
    NCD NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT3.80%
    NCD AXIS BANK LTD.3.80%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetNippon India Banking and PSU DebtUTI Banking & PSU Debt
    Equity0.0%0.0%
    Debt92.9%97.2%
    Cash and others7.1%2.8%

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeNippon India Banking and PSU Debt FundUTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)0.39%0.24%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.33%0.20%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)0.78%0.47%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)0.66%0.40%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund vs UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    Both are Banking & PSU funds, run by Nippon India Mutual Fund and UTI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 0.8%. Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund charges 0.39% a year and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund 0.24%.

    Which has given higher returns, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    Over 1 year: Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund +3.76%, UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund +5.74%. Over 3 years: Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund +6.88% a year, UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund +7.47% a year. Over 5 years: Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund +6.13% a year, UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund +7.79% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund charges less: 0.24% a year against 0.39%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund overlap?

    0.8%. They hold 2 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being 7.59% Power Finance Corporation Limited, Corporate Debt Market Development Fund Class A2. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is riskier, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    On SEBI's riskometer, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund is rated Moderate and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund Low to Moderate. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 1.20% and 0.75% a year.

    Which is better for SIP, Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund or UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,17,278 in Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund (XIRR 6.3% a year) and ₹7,35,942 in UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund (XIRR 7.3% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    Yes. 0.8% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so the two hold mostly different investments.

    Who manages Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund and UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund?

    Nippon India Banking and PSU Debt Fund: Pranay Sinha, Vivek Sharma. UTI Banking & PSU Debt Fund: Anurag Mittal FM 1, Not Applicable FM 2, Not Applicable FM 3, Not Applicable FM 4.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs