Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund
Direct Plan where a fund has one, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF is an ETF fund and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund is a mutual fund. In the year to 30-10-2026, Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF returned −7.1% and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) returned −9.4%. Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF charges 0.79% a year and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund 0.42%. Their portfolios overlap 55.6%: they hold 15 of the same securities.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
ETF
- 1 year return
- −7.1%
- Expense ratio
- 0.79%
- NAV
- ₹182.49
SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund
- 1 year return
- −9.4%
- Expense ratio
- 0.42%
- NAV
- ₹9.37
Which is better, Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF or SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF returned more over 1 year: −7.1% against −9.4%.
- SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index costs less: 0.42% a year against 0.79%.
- Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF fell less in its worst fall since 10-06-2025: −13.8% against −15.8%.
- SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index holds more in large companies: 72.9% of the fund in large caps against 49.2%.
- SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index is the larger fund: ₹303 Cr against ₹30 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 55.6%: 15 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund | SBI Mutual Fund |
| Category | ETF | Not available |
| AUM | ₹30 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹303 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹182.49 | ₹9.37 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | Not available | 0.42% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | Not available | 0.84% |
| Riskometer | Very High | Not available |
| Benchmark | BSE Quality TRI | Not available |
| Launch date | 22-08-2022 | Not available |
| Minimum investment | ₹500 | Not available |
| Lock in | None | Not available |
| Fund managers | Swapnil Mayekar, Rakesh Shetty | Not available |
| Exit load | Not available | Not available |
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | −2.67% | −9.98% | −9.70% | −7.10% | +11.12% | -- | -- |
| SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) | +0.03% | −8.18% | −5.44% | −9.40% | -- | -- | -- |
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: Year-wise Returns
| Year | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETFMotilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 IndexSBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −8.66% | −10.66% |
| 2025 | +6.44% | -- |
| 2024 | +16.64% | -- |
| 2023 | +33.61% | -- |
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against BSE Quality Index TRI, the benchmark of Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
Rolling returns
Every 1-year holding period, 97 of them, one for each trading day from 10-06-2026 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct)
BSE Quality Index TRI
to
Jun 2026Jul 2025
to
Jul 2026Aug 2025
to
Aug 2026Sept 2025
to
Sept 2026Sept 2025
to
Sept 2026Oct 2025
to
Oct 2026
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest | Beat benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | 36.1 | 35.1 | 25.8 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.9% | 2.3% | −9.5% | 11.3% | 0% |
| SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index | 72.2 | 22.7 | 5.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −2.7% | −3.4% | −10.9% | 6.0% | 0% |
| BSE Quality Index TRI | 30.9 | 38.1 | 24.7 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3% | 2.7% | −9.1% | 11.8% | -- |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. The benchmark is BSE Quality Index TRI, over the same periods. "Beat benchmark" counts the periods in which the fund did better. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 10-06-2025. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-06-2025 to 30-10-2026: 17 instalments, ₹1,70,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETFMotilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | ₹1,70,000 | ₹1,58,945 | −₹11,055 | −8.7% |
| SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 IndexSBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) | ₹1,70,000 | ₹1,59,443 | −₹10,557 | −8.3% |
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETFMotilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 IndexSBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | −7.10% | −9.40% |
| Standard deviation | 14.64% | 13.90% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.84 | -1.05 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.11 | -1.37 |
| Maximum drawdown | −13.8% (23-10-2026) | −15.8% (31-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Alpha | −0.35% | −0.42% |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +11.67% | −5.96% |
| Standard deviation | 13.83% | 12.88% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.40 | -0.88 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.55 | -1.15 |
| Maximum drawdown | −24.6% (07-04-2025) | −15.8% (31-03-2026) |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Alpha | −0.60% | −0.40% |
From daily NAVs, 26-08-2022 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct)
BSE Quality Index TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | −13.8% | 10-08-2026 | 23-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −11.9% |
| SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) | −15.8% | 07-01-2026 | 31-03-2026 | Not yet | -- | −11.8% |
| BSE Quality Index TRI | −13.7% | 10-08-2026 | 23-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −11.8% |
From daily values since 10-06-2025, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct)
BSE Quality Index TRI
Against BSE Quality Index TRI
| Fund | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | 99% | 101% | 0.12% |
| SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund (Direct) | 97% | 98% | 6.03% |
From month-end values since 10-06-2025. Up capture: a fund's average month when the benchmark rose, as % of the benchmark's; above 100% it gained more. Down capture: the same for months the benchmark fell; below 100% it fell less. Tracking error: how far the monthly returns strayed from the benchmark's, a year; an index fund aims near 0.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF, September 2026; SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 55.6%
- Held by both
- 15
- Only in Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
- 15
- Only in SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index
- 15
| Security | % of Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | % of SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index |
|---|---|---|
| Nestle India Limited | 4.93% | 4.96% |
| Infosys Limited | 5.03% | 4.92% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Limited | 4.86% | 5.09% |
| ITC Limited | 5.29% | 4.73% |
| Hindustan Unilever Limited | 5.07% | 4.47% |
| Britannia Industries Limited | 4.94% | 4.06% |
| Dixon Technologies (India) Limited | 4.98% | 4.04% |
| Hindustan Aeronautics Limited | 4.87% | 3.76% |
| Hero MotoCorp Limited | 5.24% | 3.40% |
| Marico Limited | 4.89% | 3.09% |
| Hindustan Zinc Limited | 3.07% | 3.18% |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | 4.93% | 2.89% |
| Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited | 2.70% | 3.61% |
| Page Industries Limited | 2.65% | 2.47% |
| Oracle Financial Services Software Limited | 2.95% | 2.19% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 55.6% means 55.6% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited | 5.17% |
| GE Vernova T&D India Limited | 4.68% |
| ABB India Limited | 4.06% |
| Siemens Energy India Limited | 3.26% |
| National Aluminium Company Limited | 3.13% |
Largest holdings only in SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Bharat Electronics Ltd. | 4.90% |
| HCL Technologies Ltd. | 4.66% |
| Bajaj Auto Ltd. | 4.37% |
| Coal India Ltd. | 4.22% |
| Asian Paints Ltd. | 3.48% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 100.0% | 100.1% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Cash and others | 0.0% | -0.1% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 49.2% | 72.9% |
| Mid Cap | 47.4% | 25.0% |
| Small Cap | 3.4% | 2.2% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index |
|---|---|---|
| IT - Software | 12.8% | 24.3% |
| Capital Markets | 14.5% | 2.9% |
| Electrical Equipment | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| Diversified FMCG | 10.4% | 9.2% |
| Food Products | 9.9% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Durables | 5.0% | 9.2% |
| Aerospace & Defense | 4.9% | 8.7% |
| Non - Ferrous Metals | 8.0% | 3.2% |
| Automobiles | 5.2% | 7.8% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF | SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | Not available | 0.42% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.00% | 0.29% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | Not available | 0.84% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 0.34% | 0.65% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF vs SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund?
Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF is an ETF fund, SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund is a mutual fund, run by Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund and SBI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 55.6%. Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF charges 0.79% a year and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund 0.42%.
Which has given higher returns, Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF or SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund?
Over 1 year: Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF −7.10%, SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund −9.40%. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF or SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund?
SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund charges less: 0.42% a year against 0.79%. These are the total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund overlap?
55.6%. They hold 15 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being NESTLEIND, INFY, TCS. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Can I invest in both Motilal Oswal BSE Quality ETF and SBI Nifty200 Quality 30 Index Fund?
Yes. 55.6% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.