Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund vs Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund is a Banking & PSU fund and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund is a Corporate Bond fund. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct) returned 7.1% a year and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct) returned 6.8% a year. LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund charges 0.28% a year and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund 0.33% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 11.7%: they hold 5 of the same securities.

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Banking & PSU

    3 year return
    7.1%
    Expense ratio
    0.28%
    NAV
    ₹40.02
    See LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund

    Corporate Bond

    3 year return
    6.8%
    Expense ratio
    0.33%
    NAV
    ₹44.03
    See Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund

    Which is better, LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt or Sundaram Corporate Bond? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt returned more over 5 years: 6.2% a year against 6.0%.
    • LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt returned more over 3 years: 7.1% a year against 6.8%.
    • LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt costs less: 0.28% a year against 0.33% (Direct plans).
    • LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 1.1% a year against 1.1%.
    • LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt fell less in its worst fall since 13-05-2013: −2.8% against −11.0%.
    • LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt is the larger fund: ₹1,598 Cr against ₹619 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 11.7%: 5 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactLIC MF Banking & PSU Debt FundSundaram Corporate Bond Fund
    Fund houseLIC Mutual FundSundaram Mutual Fund
    CategoryBanking & PSUCorporate Bond
    AUM₹1,598 Cr (30-09-2026)₹619 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹40.02 (Direct)₹44.03 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)0.28%0.33%
    Expense ratio (Regular)0.65%0.56%
    RiskometerNot availableModerate
    BenchmarkNot availableNIFTY Corporate Bond Index A-II
    Launch dateNot available29-12-2004
    Minimum investmentNot available₹5,000
    Lock inNot availableNone
    Fund managersNot availableSandeep Agarwal, Kumaresh Ramakrishnan, Ronak Shah
    Exit loadNot availableNIL

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)−0.17%+0.39%+2.58%+4.25%+7.11%+6.22%+6.91%
    Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)−0.26%+0.09%+2.22%+3.64%+6.82%+5.99%+6.84%
    Banking & PSU average−0.21%+0.14%+2.36%+4.04%+6.88%+6.22%+6.95%
    Corporate Bond average−0.24%+0.05%+2.31%+4.00%+7.02%+6.20%+6.98%

    Category average: the average of the 19 Banking & PSU funds and the 21 Corporate Bond funds, same plan type.

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: Year-wise Returns

    YearLIC MF Banking & PSU DebtLIC MF Banking & PSU DebtSundaram Corporate BondSundaram Corporate Bond
    2026to date+3.54%+2.98%
    2025+8.03%+7.79%
    2024+8.32%+8.23%
    2023+7.07%+6.49%
    2022+3.63%+3.92%
    2021+3.14%+3.76%

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 2,534 of them, one for each trading day from 13-05-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    0%5%10%15%
    Mar 2014
    to
    Mar 2017
    Dec 2015
    to
    Dec 2018
    Oct 2017
    to
    Oct 2020
    Jul 2019
    to
    Jul 2022
    Apr 2021
    to
    Apr 2024
    Dec 2022
    to
    Dec 2025
    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighest
    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt0.07.592.50.00.00.00.07.3%7.7%4.4%9.3%
    Sundaram Corporate Bond0.05.481.912.70.00.00.07.9%7.7%4.5%13.5%

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 13-05-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-05-2013 to 30-10-2026: 162 instalments, ₹16,20,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    LIC MF Banking & PSU DebtLIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct) ₹16,20,000 ₹26,27,298 ₹10,07,298 6.9%
    Sundaram Corporate BondSundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct) ₹16,20,000 ₹26,74,479 ₹10,54,479 7.1%
    ₹0₹10.0 L₹20.0 L₹30.0 L
    2014201620182020202220242026
    LIC MF Banking & PSU DebtLIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)Sundaram Corporate BondSundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureLIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+7.11%+6.82%
    Standard deviation1.06%1.07%
    Sharpe ratio1.020.75
    Sortino ratio1.541.08
    Maximum drawdown−0.6% (13-06-2025)−0.6% (23-10-2026)
    Beta----
    Alpha----

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −12%−10%−8%−6%−4%−2%0%
    2014201620182020202220242026
    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)−2.8%06-03-202023-03-202020-04-202028 days−0.3%
    Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)−11.0%28-05-201319-08-201305-05-20149 months−0.5%

    From daily values since 13-05-2013, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%1%2%3%4%5%6%
    20172019202120232025
    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (Direct)Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (Direct)

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund, September 2026; Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    11.7%
    Held by both
    5
    Only in LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt
    42
    Only in Sundaram Corporate Bond
    30
    Security% of LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt% of Sundaram Corporate Bond
    7.83% Small Industries Development Bk of India3.34%4.04%
    7.37% Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd.3.21%6.41%
    7.46% REC Ltd.3.18%4.02%
    6.66% National Bk for Agriculture & Rural Dev.1.63%4.75%
    SBI CDMDF--A20.34%0.50%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 11.7% means 11.7% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund

    Security% of fund
    8.09% NLC India Ltd.3.89%
    8.14% Nuclear Power Corporation3.80%
    8.37% National Highways Authority of India3.37%
    7.75% Bharti Telecom Ltd.3.24%
    7.62% National Bk for Agriculture & Rural Dev.3.21%

    Largest holdings only in Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund

    Security% of fund
    LIC Housing Finance Ltd - 7.7% - 16/05/20284.83%
    Power Finance Corporation Ltd - 7.75% - 11/06/20304.83%
    National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development - 7.48% - 15/09/20284.02%
    Embassy Office Parks REIT - 7.21% - 17/03/20284.00%
    6.94% Central Government Securities 11/05/20363.97%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetLIC MF Banking & PSU DebtSundaram Corporate Bond
    Equity0.0%0.0%
    Debt94.4%90.9%
    Cash and others5.6%9.1%

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt vs Sundaram Corporate Bond: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeLIC MF Banking & PSU Debt FundSundaram Corporate Bond Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)0.28%0.33%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.23%0.27%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)0.65%0.56%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)0.57%0.47%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund vs Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund?

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund is a Banking & PSU fund, Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund is a Corporate Bond fund, run by LIC Mutual Fund and Sundaram Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 11.7%. LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund charges 0.28% a year and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund 0.33%.

    Which has given higher returns, LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund or Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund?

    Over 1 year: LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund +4.25%, Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund +3.64%. Over 3 years: LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund +7.11% a year, Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund +6.82% a year. Over 5 years: LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund +6.22% a year, Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund +5.99% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund or Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund?

    LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund charges less: 0.28% a year against 0.33%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund overlap?

    11.7%. They hold 5 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being 7.83% Small Industries Development Bk of India, 7.37% Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd., 7.46% REC Ltd.. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is better for SIP, LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund or Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund?

    Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,20,896 in LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund (XIRR 6.5% a year) and ₹7,14,802 in Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund (XIRR 6.2% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both LIC MF Banking & PSU Debt Fund and Sundaram Corporate Bond Fund?

    Yes. 11.7% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so some of the two investments would move together.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs