Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund are both Multi Asset funds. JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund charges 1.05% a year and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund 0.48% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 6.1%: they hold 7 of the same securities.

    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Multi Asset

    Expense ratio
    1.05%
    NAV
    ₹9.75
    See JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Multi Asset

    Expense ratio
    0.48%
    NAV
    ₹25.81
    See Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Which is better, JM Multi Asset Allocation or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation costs less: 0.48% a year against 1.05% (Direct plans).
    • Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation fell less in its worst fall since 20-07-2026: −8.2% against −8.8%.
    • Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation holds 4.5% of the fund in foreign stocks; JM Multi Asset Allocation 0.0%.
    • Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation holds more in large companies: 40.1% of the fund in large caps against 17.0%.
    • Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation is the larger fund: ₹18,044 Cr against ₹167 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 6.1%: 7 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactJM Multi Asset Allocation FundNippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund
    Fund houseJM Financial Mutual FundNippon India Mutual Fund
    CategoryMulti AssetMulti Asset
    AUM₹167 Cr (30-09-2026)₹18,044 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹9.75 (Direct)₹25.81 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)1.05%0.48%
    Expense ratio (Regular)2.73%1.44%
    RiskometerVery HighNot available
    Benchmark55% Nifty 500 + 30% CRISIL Short term bond Index + 10% Domestic Price of Gold + 5% Domestic Price of silverNot available
    Launch date15-07-2026Not available
    Minimum investment₹5,000Not available
    Lock inNoneNot available
    Fund managersAsit Bhandarkar, Deepak Gupta, Killol Pandya, Satish RamanathanNot available
    Exit loadIn respect of each purchase/ switch-in of Units, an Exit Load of 1.00% is payable if Units are redeemed/ switched-out within 60 days from the date of allotment. No Exit Load is payable if Units are redeemed / switched-out after 60 days from the date of allotment.Not available

    JM Multi Asset Allocation vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)−3.19%−3.00%----------
    Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)−2.06%−3.53%−1.74%+3.05%+17.96%+13.83%--
    Multi Asset average−1.71%−3.33%−1.78%+2.00%+14.20%+12.56%--

    Category average: the average of the 37 Multi Asset funds, same plan type.

    JM Multi Asset Allocation vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: Year-wise Returns

    YearJMJM Multi Asset AllocationNippon IndiaNippon India Multi Asset Allocation
    2026to date--+0.43%
    2025--+20.96%
    2024--+20.14%
    2023--+25.92%
    2022--+4.63%
    2021--+21.10%

    JM Multi Asset Allocation vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds

    JM Multi Asset Allocation vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureJM Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)−8.20%+16.79%
    Standard deviation10.24%9.40%
    Sharpe ratio-1.311.22
    Sortino ratio-1.631.70
    Maximum drawdown−8.8% (23-10-2026)−10.8% (23-03-2026)
    Beta----
    Alpha----

    From daily NAVs, 20-07-2026 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −10%−8%−6%−4%−2%0%
    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)−8.8%26-08-202623-10-2026Not yet--−7.3%
    Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund (Direct)−8.2%25-08-202623-10-2026Not yet--−7.0%

    From daily values since 20-07-2026, the first day every fund has.

    JM Multi Asset Allocation vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund, September 2026; Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    6.1%
    Held by both
    7
    Only in JM Multi Asset Allocation
    46
    Only in Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation
    156
    Security% of JM Multi Asset Allocation% of Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation
    HDFC Bank Limited1.91%3.25%
    Eternal Limited1.63%1.65%
    Titan Company Limited1.47%0.81%
    Shriram Finance Limited1.42%0.53%
    InterGlobe Aviation Limited1.10%0.43%
    Bajaj Finance Limited1.84%0.40%
    Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd1.41%0.35%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 6.1% means 6.1% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Security% of fund
    Tata Gold Exchange Traded Fund6.84%
    DSP Mutual Fund - DSP Gold ETF4.35%
    8.75% Piramal Finance Ltd 29-OCT-20272.99%
    7.23% Power Finance Corporation Limited 05-JAN-20272.99%
    Bank of Baroda 11-DEC-20262.96%

    Largest holdings only in Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund

    Security% of fund
    Nippon India ETF Gold Bees7.94%
    ICICI Bank Limited3.44%
    Nippon India Silver ETF2.70%
    Axis Bank Limited2.42%
    State Bank of India1.69%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetJM Multi Asset AllocationNippon India Multi Asset Allocation
    Equity49.3%62.0%
    Debt29.0%18.6%
    Cash and others21.7%19.3%

    Market cap of stocks

    Market capJM Multi Asset AllocationNippon India Multi Asset Allocation
    Large Cap17.0%40.1%
    Mid Cap10.5%10.3%
    Small Cap16.1%7.0%
    Foreign stocks0.0%4.5%
    Not on AMFI's list5.8%0.2%

    Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.

    Largest sectors

    SectorJM Multi Asset AllocationNippon India Multi Asset Allocation
    Banks6.1%12.3%
    Retailing3.0%6.6%
    Other0.0%4.5%
    Electrical Equipment3.8%1.1%
    Auto Components3.7%1.8%
    Finance3.3%3.1%
    Capital Markets3.2%1.7%
    Consumer Durables3.1%3.0%
    Automobiles1.5%3.0%

    The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.

    JM Multi Asset Allocation vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeJM Multi Asset Allocation FundNippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)1.05%0.48%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.40%0.30%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)2.73%1.44%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)1.82%1.14%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund vs Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

    Both are Multi Asset funds, run by JM Financial Mutual Fund and Nippon India Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 6.1%. JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund charges 1.05% a year and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund 0.48%.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund or Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

    Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund charges less: 0.48% a year against 1.05%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund overlap?

    6.1%. They hold 7 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being HDFCBANK, ETERNAL, TITAN. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Can I invest in both JM Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund?

    Yes. 6.1% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so the two hold mostly different investments.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs