Skip to content

Launch offerPay once, own it forever. Lifetime plans from ₹4,999, capped at the first 200 members.See lifetime plans →

Popular

    JM Arbitrage Fund vs Nippon India Arbitrage Fund

    Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026

    JM Arbitrage Fund and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund are both Arbitrage funds. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, JM Arbitrage Fund (Direct) returned 6.9% a year and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct) returned 7.3% a year. JM Arbitrage Fund charges 1.42% a year and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund 1.35% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 44.0%: they hold 103 of the same securities.

    JM Arbitrage Fund

    Arbitrage

    3 year return
    6.9%
    Expense ratio
    1.42%
    NAV
    ₹37.71
    See JM Arbitrage Fund

    Nippon India Arbitrage Fund

    Arbitrage

    3 year return
    7.3%
    Expense ratio
    1.35%
    NAV
    ₹31.21
    See Nippon India Arbitrage Fund

    Which is better, JM Arbitrage or Nippon India Arbitrage? Key differences

    It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.

    • Nippon India Arbitrage returned more over 5 years: 6.8% a year against 6.4%.
    • Nippon India Arbitrage returned more over 3 years: 7.3% a year against 6.9%.
    • Nippon India Arbitrage costs less: 1.35% a year against 1.42% (Direct plans).
    • Nippon India Arbitrage swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 1.1% a year against 1.1%.
    • JM Arbitrage fell less in its worst fall since 03-01-2013: −0.5% against −0.6%.
    • Nippon India Arbitrage is the larger fund: ₹17,216 Cr against ₹341 Cr.
    • Their portfolios overlap 44.0%: 103 of the same holdings.

    Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.

    Key facts

    From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI

    FactJM Arbitrage FundNippon India Arbitrage Fund
    Fund houseJM Financial Mutual FundNippon India Mutual Fund
    CategoryArbitrageArbitrage
    AUM₹341 Cr (30-09-2026)₹17,216 Cr (30-09-2026)
    NAV₹37.71 (Direct)₹31.21 (Direct)
    Expense ratio (Direct)1.42%1.35%
    Expense ratio (Regular)2.07%2.04%
    RiskometerLowNot available
    BenchmarkNifty 50 Arbitrage IndexNot available
    Launch date18-07-2006Not available
    Minimum investment₹1,000Not available
    Lock inNoneNot available
    Fund managersAsit Bhandarkar, Satish Ramanathan, Deepak Gupta, Ruchi FozdarNot available
    Exit load0.5% of NAV on all investment (including SIP/STP/SWP) transactions, if redeemed / switched - out within 30 days of transfer / allotment of units in normal transactions / allotment of units of respective installments in SIP/STP/SWP transactions.Not available

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: Returns Comparison

    Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.

    Fund1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y10Y
    JM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)+0.52%+1.53%+3.14%+6.43%+6.94%+6.44%+5.63%
    Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)+0.52%+1.54%+3.29%+6.71%+7.28%+6.83%+6.47%
    Arbitrage average+0.56%+1.52%+3.20%+6.62%+7.18%+6.68%+6.31%

    Category average: the average of the 39 Arbitrage funds, same plan type.

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: Year-wise Returns

    YearJMJM ArbitrageNippon IndiaNippon India Arbitrage
    2026to date+5.21%+5.47%
    2025+6.61%+6.94%
    2024+7.96%+8.23%
    2023+7.39%+7.85%
    2022+4.62%+4.94%
    2021+3.16%+4.54%

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: Rolling Returns

    Every holding period of both funds

    Rolling returns

    Every 3-year holding period, 2,669 of them, one for each trading day from 04-01-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.

    0%2%4%6%8%10%
    Nov 2013
    to
    Nov 2016
    Sept 2015
    to
    Sept 2018
    Jul 2017
    to
    Jul 2020
    May 2019
    to
    May 2022
    Mar 2021
    to
    Mar 2024
    Dec 2022
    to
    Dec 2025
    JM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)

    How the periods spread

    FundBelow 0%0-5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%Above 25%MeanMedianLowestHighest
    JM Arbitrage0.028.771.30.00.00.00.06.0%6.2%3.4%8.8%
    Nippon India Arbitrage0.09.390.70.00.00.00.06.8%6.9%4.6%9.0%

    The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 03-01-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: SIP and Lumpsum Returns

    What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history

    Growth of an investment

    Step up each year
    PeriodFor

    ₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 03-01-2013 to 30-10-2026: 166 instalments, ₹16,60,000 in all.

    InvestmentInvestedValue nowGainReturn a year
    JM ArbitrageJM Arbitrage Fund (Direct) ₹16,60,000 ₹25,49,864 ₹8,89,864 6.0%
    Nippon India ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct) ₹16,60,000 ₹26,86,329 ₹10,26,329 6.7%
    ₹0₹10.0 L₹20.0 L₹30.0 L
    2014201620182020202220242026
    JM ArbitrageJM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)Nippon India ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)Amount invested

    From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: Risk and Drawdowns

    How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days

    Risk and return

    MeasureJM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)
    Return (CAGR)+6.94%+7.28%
    Standard deviation1.14%1.06%
    Sharpe ratio0.811.18
    Sortino ratio1.221.81
    Maximum drawdown−0.5% (06-08-2026)−0.5% (06-08-2026)
    Beta----
    Alpha----

    From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.

    Drawdowns

    How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.

    −0.8%−0.6%−0.4%−0.2%0%
    2014201620182020202220242026
    JM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)
    FundWorst fallHigh before itBottomBack at the highTime to climb backBelow its high today
    JM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)−0.5%29-05-202009-07-202021-09-20202 months−0.1%
    Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)−0.6%16-03-202025-03-202031-03-20206 days−0.0%

    From daily values since 03-01-2013, the first day every fund has.

    Rolling standard deviation

    Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.

    0%0.5%1%1.5%
    20172019202120232025
    JM Arbitrage Fund (Direct)Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (Direct)

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: Portfolio Overlap

    From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: JM Arbitrage Fund, September 2026; Nippon India Arbitrage Fund, September 2026

    Holdings in common

    Overlap
    44.0%
    Held by both
    103
    Only in JM Arbitrage
    10
    Only in Nippon India Arbitrage
    66
    Security% of JM Arbitrage% of Nippon India Arbitrage
    ICICI Bank Limited4.54%4.21%
    Reliance Industries Limited4.13%4.83%
    Axis Bank Limited3.89%2.45%
    State Bank of India2.60%2.02%
    Tata Steel Limited3.27%1.35%
    Vodafone Idea Limited3.40%1.34%
    Bajaj Finance Limited1.33%1.71%
    Adani Enterprises Limited1.92%1.32%
    Maruti Suzuki India Limited1.28%1.42%
    Steel Authority of India Limited1.18%1.11%

    Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 44.0% means 44.0% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.

    Largest holdings only in JM Arbitrage Fund

    Security% of fund
    JM Financial Mutual Fund7.82%
    364 Days Treasury Bill 06-Nov-20261.46%
    182 Days Treasury Bill 19-Nov-20261.46%
    364 Days Treasury Bill 03-Dec-20261.45%
    364 Days Treasury Bill 15-JAN-20271.44%

    Largest holdings only in Nippon India Arbitrage Fund

    Security% of fund
    Nippon India Money Market Fund Dir Pl-Growth-Gr Op15.46%
    Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund- Dr Gr Op8.14%
    Small Industries Dev Bank of India1.14%
    National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development0.84%
    Infosys Limited0.68%

    Asset and sector split

    Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio

    Asset allocation

    AssetJM ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
    Equity77.1%68.0%
    Debt7.3%4.4%
    Cash and others15.6%27.6%

    Market cap of stocks

    Market capJM ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
    Large Cap57.7%51.7%
    Mid Cap13.0%13.7%
    Small Cap6.4%2.6%

    Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.

    Largest sectors

    SectorJM ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
    Banks23.7%20.1%
    Finance6.3%5.2%
    Telecom - Services6.2%2.9%
    Petroleum Products4.4%5.3%
    Ferrous Metals5.1%4.3%
    Automobiles4.1%3.7%
    Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology3.4%3.0%

    The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.

    JM Arbitrage vs Nippon India Arbitrage: Expense Ratio

    What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file

    ChargeJM Arbitrage FundNippon India Arbitrage Fund
    Total expense ratio (Direct)1.42%1.35%
    Base expense ratio (Direct)0.35%0.31%
    Total expense ratio (Regular)2.07%2.04%
    Base expense ratio (Regular)0.91%0.90%

    The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.

    More comparisons

    Each fund against the others of its category

    JM Arbitrage Fund vs Nippon India Arbitrage Fund: Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between JM Arbitrage Fund and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund?

    Both are Arbitrage funds, run by JM Financial Mutual Fund and Nippon India Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 44.0%. JM Arbitrage Fund charges 1.42% a year and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund 1.35%.

    Which has given higher returns, JM Arbitrage Fund or Nippon India Arbitrage Fund?

    Over 1 year: JM Arbitrage Fund +6.43%, Nippon India Arbitrage Fund +6.71%. Over 3 years: JM Arbitrage Fund +6.94% a year, Nippon India Arbitrage Fund +7.28% a year. Over 5 years: JM Arbitrage Fund +6.44% a year, Nippon India Arbitrage Fund +6.83% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Which has the lower expense ratio, JM Arbitrage Fund or Nippon India Arbitrage Fund?

    Nippon India Arbitrage Fund charges less: 1.35% a year against 1.42%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.

    How much do JM Arbitrage Fund and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund overlap?

    44.0%. They hold 103 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being ICICIBANK, RELIANCE, AXISBANK. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.

    Which is better for SIP, JM Arbitrage Fund or Nippon India Arbitrage Fund?

    Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,25,615 in JM Arbitrage Fund (XIRR 6.8% a year) and ₹7,31,798 in Nippon India Arbitrage Fund (XIRR 7.1% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.

    Can I invest in both JM Arbitrage Fund and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund?

    Yes. 44.0% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.

    Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.

    This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.

    Track both funds in WealthGamma

    Add your funds once. WealthGamma updates their value every day and shows them next to your stocks, gold, deposits and loans.

    PAN not required · No broker linking · No OTPs