ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality Fund
Direct Plan where a fund has one, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF is an ETF fund and SBI Quality Fund is a Thematic fund. ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF charges 0.34% a year and SBI Quality Fund 1.34%. Their portfolios overlap 29.8%: they hold 10 of the same securities.
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF
ETF
- Expense ratio
- 0.34%
- NAV
- ₹19.70
Which is better, ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF or SBI Quality? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF costs less: 0.34% a year against 1.34%.
- SBI Quality fell less in its worst fall since 23-02-2026: −10.4% against −12.0%.
- SBI Quality holds 3.1% of the fund in foreign stocks; ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF 0.0%.
- ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF holds more in large companies: 72.8% of the fund in large caps against 52.2%.
- SBI Quality is the larger fund: ₹2,578 Cr against ₹130 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 29.8%: 10 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI Quality Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund | SBI Mutual Fund |
| Category | ETF | Thematic |
| AUM | ₹130 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹2,578 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹19.70 | ₹10.29 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | Not available | 1.34% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | Not available | 2.42% |
| Riskometer | Not available | Very High |
| Benchmark | Nifty 200 Quality 30 TRI | Nifty 200 Quality 30 TRI |
| Launch date | 07-08-2023 | 17-02-2026 |
| Minimum investment | During Ongoing/Continuous Offer: On Stock Exchanges: Investors can buy/sell units of the Scheme in round lot of 1 unit and in multiples thereof. Directly with the Mutual Fund: Investors can buy or sell units of the scheme in creation unit size and its mul | ₹5,000 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Nishit Patel, Ashwini Bharucha, Venus Ahuja | Anup Upadhyay |
| Exit load | NIL There will be no exit load for units sold through the secondary market on the stock exchanges where the Scheme will be listed. | Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 6 months. |
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | +0.04% | −8.14% | −5.38% | −9.28% | +6.97% | -- | -- |
| SBI Quality Fund (Direct) | −2.44% | −3.22% | +3.73% | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Thematic average | −2.09% | −4.52% | +0.86% | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Category average: the average of the 235 Thematic funds, same plan type.
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality: Year-wise Returns
| Year | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETFICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI QualitySBI Quality | NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | −10.56% | -- | −10.34% |
| 2025 | +4.35% | -- | +4.68% |
| 2024 | +14.02% | -- | +14.42% |
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds, against NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI, the benchmark of both
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI Quality Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +6.55% | +4.77% |
| Standard deviation | 13.20% | 13.57% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.04 | -0.03 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.05 | -0.04 |
| Maximum drawdown | −22.5% (04-03-2025) | −10.4% (23-10-2026) |
| Beta | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Alpha | −0.36% | +10.71% |
From daily NAVs, 08-08-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF
SBI Quality Fund (Direct)
NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | −12.0% | 10-08-2026 | 08-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −9.9% |
| SBI Quality Fund (Direct) | −10.4% | 31-08-2026 | 23-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −7.5% |
| NIFTY200 Quality 30 TRI | −12.0% | 10-08-2026 | 08-10-2026 | Not yet | -- | −9.9% |
From daily values since 23-02-2026, the first day every fund has.
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF, September 2026; SBI Quality Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 29.8%
- Held by both
- 10
- Only in ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF
- 20
- Only in SBI Quality
- 37
| Security | % of ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | % of SBI Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Nestle India Ltd. | 4.95% | 5.16% |
| Bajaj Auto Ltd. | 4.37% | 5.59% |
| Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. | 3.76% | 3.75% |
| Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd. | 4.04% | 3.34% |
| Solar Industries India Ltd. | 3.15% | 4.13% |
| Marico Ltd. | 3.08% | 3.93% |
| Hindustan Zinc Ltd. | 3.18% | 2.99% |
| Persistent Systems Ltd. | 2.98% | 2.15% |
| Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. | 2.18% | 1.33% |
| Cummins India Ltd. | 2.99% | 0.70% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 29.8% means 29.8% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. | 5.08% |
| Infosys Ltd. | 4.92% |
| Bharat Electronics Ltd. | 4.90% |
| ITC Ltd. | 4.73% |
| HCL Technologies Ltd. | 4.66% |
Largest holdings only in SBI Quality Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| Pearl Global Industries Ltd. | 2.93% |
| TVS Motor Company Ltd. | 2.78% |
| Powerica Ltd. | 2.25% |
| City Union Bank Ltd. | 2.18% |
| Ajanta Pharma Ltd. | 2.15% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 100.0% | 95.2% |
| Debt | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Cash and others | 0.0% | 4.5% |
Market cap of stocks
| Market cap | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 72.8% | 52.2% |
| Mid Cap | 25.0% | 19.7% |
| Small Cap | 2.2% | 18.2% |
| Foreign stocks | 0.0% | 3.1% |
| Not on AMFI's list | 0.0% | 2.0% |
Share of the whole fund. Groups follow AMFI's latest list: Large Cap is the 100 largest companies, Mid Cap the next 150, Small Cap the rest.
Largest sectors
| Sector | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI Quality |
|---|---|---|
| It - Software | 24.3% | 0.0% |
| Automobiles | 7.8% | 10.3% |
| Diversified Fmcg | 9.2% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Durables | 9.2% | 5.2% |
| Food Products | 9.0% | 5.2% |
| Aerospace & Defense | 8.7% | 3.8% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 0.0% | 8.3% |
| Banks | 0.0% | 8.1% |
| IT - Software | 0.0% | 6.8% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 0.0% | 6.8% |
| Electrical Equipment | 0.0% | 6.0% |
The six largest sectors of each fund's stocks, % of the fund.
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF | SBI Quality Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | Not available | 1.34% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.00% | 0.77% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | Not available | 2.42% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 0.26% | 1.70% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF vs SBI Quality Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF and SBI Quality Fund?
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF is an ETF fund, SBI Quality Fund is a Thematic fund, run by ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund and SBI Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 29.8%. ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF charges 0.34% a year and SBI Quality Fund 1.34%.
Which has the lower expense ratio, ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF or SBI Quality Fund?
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF charges less: 0.34% a year against 1.34%. These are the total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF and SBI Quality Fund overlap?
29.8%. They hold 10 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being NESTLEIND, BAJAJ-AUTO, HAL. From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Can I invest in both ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF and SBI Quality Fund?
Yes. 29.8% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so some of the two investments would move together.
Who manages ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF and SBI Quality Fund?
ICICI Prudential Nifty 200 Quality 30 ETF: Nishit Patel, Ashwini Bharucha, Venus Ahuja. SBI Quality Fund: Anup Upadhyay.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.