Axis Gilt Fund vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund
Direct Plan, Growth option · Data as on 30-10-2026
Axis Gilt Fund is a Gilt fund and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund is a Dynamic Bond fund. In the 3 years to 30-10-2026, Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) returned 6.9% a year and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) returned 5.4% a year. Axis Gilt Fund charges 0.46% a year and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund 0.74% (Direct plans). Their portfolios overlap 45.2%: they hold 2 of the same securities.
Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund
Dynamic Bond
- 3 year return
- 5.4%
- Expense ratio
- 0.74%
- NAV
- ₹32.75
Which is better, Axis Gilt or Canara Robeco Dynamic Term? Key differences
It depends on what you want from the fund. These are the differences in numbers, from the data on this page.
- Axis Gilt returned more over 5 years: 5.9% a year against 5.0%.
- Axis Gilt returned more over 3 years: 6.9% a year against 5.4%.
- Axis Gilt costs less: 0.46% a year against 0.74% (Direct plans).
- Canara Robeco Dynamic Term swung less over 3 years: a standard deviation of 2.5% a year against 2.9%.
- Canara Robeco Dynamic Term fell less in its worst fall since 02-01-2013: −6.2% against −11.1%.
- Axis Gilt is the larger fund: ₹336 Cr against ₹80 Cr.
- Their portfolios overlap 45.2%: 2 of the same holdings.
Past returns do not promise future returns. This page is information, not investment advice.
Key facts
From each fund's scheme summary document and AMFI
| Fact | Axis Gilt Fund | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | Axis Mutual Fund | Canara Robeco Mutual Fund |
| Category | Gilt | Dynamic Bond |
| AUM | ₹336 Cr (30-09-2026) | ₹80 Cr (30-09-2026) |
| NAV | ₹28.24 (Direct) | ₹32.75 (Direct) |
| Expense ratio (Direct) | 0.46% | 0.74% |
| Expense ratio (Regular) | 0.86% | 1.71% |
| Riskometer | Moderate | Moderate |
| Benchmark | CRISIL Dynamic Gilt Index | CRISIL Dynamic Bond A-III Index |
| Launch date | 23-01-2012 | 29-05-2009 |
| Minimum investment | ₹5,000 | ₹5,000 |
| Lock in | None | None |
| Fund managers | Devang Shah, Sachin Jain | Avnish Jain / Mr. Bhupesh Kalyani |
| Exit load | Nil | NIL |
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: Returns Comparison
Returns as on 30-10-2026. Up to one year they are absolute returns. Longer periods are a rate per year.
| Fund | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) | −0.49% | −1.03% | +2.03% | +3.08% | +6.94% | +5.86% | +6.74% |
| Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | −0.80% | −1.48% | +0.69% | +1.14% | +5.42% | +4.99% | +5.83% |
| Gilt average | −0.69% | −1.34% | +1.62% | +2.12% | +6.19% | +5.46% | +6.64% |
| Dynamic Bond average | −0.48% | −0.66% | +1.80% | +3.05% | +6.70% | +5.98% | +6.68% |
Category average: the average of the 28 Gilt funds and the 22 Dynamic Bond funds, same plan type.
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: Year-wise Returns
| Year | Axis GiltAxis Gilt | Canara Robeco Dynamic TermCanara Robeco Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|
| 2026to date | +2.44% | +0.71% |
| 2025 | +5.63% | +4.52% |
| 2024 | +10.33% | +8.88% |
| 2023 | +7.65% | +6.82% |
| 2022 | +2.99% | +3.60% |
| 2021 | +2.99% | +2.27% |
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: Rolling Returns
Every holding period of both funds
Rolling returns
Every 3-year holding period, 2,626 of them, one for each trading day from 04-01-2016 to 30-10-2026: the yearly return (CAGR) of each, plotted on the day it ended. One lucky or unlucky start day cannot flatter or hide a fund.
Axis Gilt Fund (Direct)
Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
to
Nov 2016Sept 2015
to
Sept 2018Jul 2017
to
Jul 2020May 2019
to
May 2022Mar 2021
to
Mar 2024Dec 2022
to
Dec 2025
How the periods spread
| Fund | Below 0% | 0-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% | 15-20% | 20-25% | Above 25% | Mean | Median | Lowest | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Gilt | 0.0 | 6.0 | 73.6 | 20.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.9% | 7.4% | 4.0% | 13.4% |
| Canara Robeco Dynamic Term | 0.0 | 8.8 | 79.4 | 11.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.4% | 7.3% | 3.7% | 13.3% |
The table shows the % of periods in each return band; a darker cell holds more of them. Lumpsum: the yearly rate (CAGR) from a period's first NAV to its last. SIP: the XIRR of the monthly instalments. Every fund is measured over the days all of them have, from 02-01-2013. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: SIP and Lumpsum Returns
What the same monthly or one-time investment would be worth in each fund today, from their own NAV history
Growth of an investment
₹10,000 on the first trading day of every month, from 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026: 166 instalments, ₹16,60,000 in all.
| Investment | Invested | Value now | Gain | Return a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis GiltAxis Gilt Fund (Direct) | ₹16,60,000 | ₹27,68,024 | ₹11,08,024 | 7.1% |
| Canara Robeco Dynamic TermCanara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | ₹16,60,000 | ₹25,83,461 | ₹9,23,461 | 6.1% |
Axis GiltAxis Gilt Fund (Direct)
Canara Robeco Dynamic TermCanara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
Amount invested
From each plan's published NAV (Growth option), over the same days. Return a year: XIRR for a SIP, CAGR for a lumpsum, shown for a year or more. It does not include exit load, stamp duty or tax. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: Risk and Drawdowns
How much each fund swings, and the worst fall over the same days
Risk and return
| Measure | Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +3.08% | +1.14% |
| Standard deviation | 3.16% | 2.18% |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.69 | -1.88 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.96 | -2.39 |
| Maximum drawdown | −2.4% (02-04-2026) | −2.4% (23-10-2026) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2025 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +6.94% | +5.42% |
| Standard deviation | 2.93% | 2.51% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | -0.24 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.45 | -0.33 |
| Maximum drawdown | −3.0% (26-08-2025) | −3.3% (26-08-2025) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 30-10-2023 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +5.86% | +4.99% |
| Standard deviation | 2.56% | 2.24% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.03 | -0.36 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.04 | -0.49 |
| Maximum drawdown | −3.0% (26-08-2025) | −3.3% (26-08-2025) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 29-10-2021 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
| Measure | Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) |
|---|---|---|
| Return (CAGR) | +7.28% | +7.17% |
| Standard deviation | 4.02% | 3.19% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | 0.35 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.43 | 0.52 |
| Maximum drawdown | −11.1% (19-08-2013) | −6.2% (19-08-2013) |
| Beta | -- | -- |
| Alpha | -- | -- |
From daily NAVs, 02-01-2013 to 30-10-2026. Standard deviation: how much the daily value swings, scaled to a year. Sharpe: return above the risk-free rate (NSE's overnight rate index) per unit of swing. Sortino: the same, counting only the falls. Beta and alpha compare each fund with its own benchmark's TRI.
Drawdowns
How far below its previous high each one was on every day: the falls an investor had to sit through. 0% means it was at a new high.
Axis Gilt Fund (Direct)
Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
| Fund | Worst fall | High before it | Bottom | Back at the high | Time to climb back | Below its high today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis Gilt Fund (Direct) | −11.1% | 27-05-2013 | 19-08-2013 | 18-09-2014 | 13 months | −1.9% |
| Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct) | −6.2% | 28-05-2013 | 19-08-2013 | 20-01-2014 | 5 months | −2.1% |
From daily values since 02-01-2013, the first day every fund has.
Rolling standard deviation
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 1-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Axis Gilt Fund (Direct)
Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 3-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Axis Gilt Fund (Direct)
Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
Whether the swings have grown or calmed over time: the standard deviation of daily changes over every 5-year window, scaled to a year, plotted on the window's last day. Higher means a bumpier ride.
Axis Gilt Fund (Direct)
Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (Direct)
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: Portfolio Overlap
From each fund's latest monthly portfolio: Axis Gilt Fund, September 2026; Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund, September 2026
Holdings in common
- Overlap
- 45.2%
- Held by both
- 2
- Only in Axis Gilt
- 23
- Only in Canara Robeco Dynamic Term
- 8
| Security | % of Axis Gilt | % of Canara Robeco Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|
| 6.94% Government of India (11/05/2036) | 34.04% | 49.63% |
| 7.24% Government of India (18/08/2055) | 11.14% | 14.78% |
Overlap: for each holding both funds own, the smaller of its two weights, added up. 45.2% means 45.2% of each fund's money sits in positions the other also holds. Matched by ISIN. Cash and hedged positions are left out.
Largest holdings only in Axis Gilt Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| 91 Days Tbill (MD 10/12/2026) | 7.36% |
| 364 Days Tbill (MD 10/12/2026) | 7.36% |
| 7.09% Government of India (05/08/2054) | 6.95% |
| 7.06% Government of India (27/07/2041) | 3.72% |
| 7.63% Government of India (15/09/2056) | 3.49% |
Largest holdings only in Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund
| Security | % of fund |
|---|---|
| 8.05% GUJARAT SDL 31-JAN-28 | 10.05% |
| ICICI Securities Ltd (23/03/2027) | 6.02% |
| 7.38% GOI 20-JUN-27 | 3.14% |
| 6.53% GOI 2031 (07-SEP-2031) | 3.07% |
| 6.64% TAMIL NADU SDL 11-MAR-29 | 2.91% |
Asset and sector split
Share of each fund, from its latest monthly portfolio
Asset allocation
| Asset | Axis Gilt | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Debt | 97.0% | 90.5% |
| Cash and others | 3.0% | 9.5% |
Axis Gilt vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term: Expense Ratio
What each plan charges a year, from AMFI's expense ratio file
| Charge | Axis Gilt Fund | Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Total expense ratio (Direct) | 0.46% | 0.74% |
| Base expense ratio (Direct) | 0.37% | 0.61% |
| Total expense ratio (Regular) | 0.86% | 1.71% |
| Base expense ratio (Regular) | 0.71% | 1.44% |
The expense ratio comes out of the fund's assets every day, so every return on this page is already after it. Base expense ratio: the fund house's own fee. The total adds brokerage, transaction costs, and levies with GST.
More comparisons
Each fund against the others of its category
Compare Axis Gilt with
Axis Gilt Fund vs Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund: Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Axis Gilt Fund and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
Axis Gilt Fund is a Gilt fund, Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund is a Dynamic Bond fund, run by Axis Mutual Fund and Canara Robeco Mutual Fund. Their portfolios overlap 45.2%. Axis Gilt Fund charges 0.46% a year and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund 0.74%.
Which has given higher returns, Axis Gilt Fund or Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
Over 1 year: Axis Gilt Fund +3.08%, Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund +1.14%. Over 3 years: Axis Gilt Fund +6.94% a year, Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund +5.42% a year. Over 5 years: Axis Gilt Fund +5.86% a year, Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund +4.99% a year. As on 30-10-2026. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Which has the lower expense ratio, Axis Gilt Fund or Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
Axis Gilt Fund charges less: 0.46% a year against 0.74%. These are the Direct plans' total expense ratios reported to AMFI.
How much do Axis Gilt Fund and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund overlap?
45.2%. They hold 2 of the same securities, the largest shared ones being 6.94% Government of India (11/05/2036), 7.24% Government of India (18/08/2055). From each fund's latest monthly portfolio.
Which is riskier, Axis Gilt Fund or Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
On SEBI's riskometer, Axis Gilt Fund is rated Moderate and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund Moderate. Over 3 years, the standard deviation of daily returns was 2.93% and 2.51% a year.
Which is better for SIP, Axis Gilt Fund or Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
Over the last 5 years, a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 from 01-10-2021 to 30-10-2026 grew to ₹7,09,346 in Axis Gilt Fund (XIRR 5.9% a year) and ₹6,85,150 in Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund (XIRR 4.5% a year). Both received 61 instalments. Past returns do not promise future returns.
Can I invest in both Axis Gilt Fund and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
Yes. 45.2% of each fund's money sits in the same holdings, so a large part of the two investments would move together.
Who manages Axis Gilt Fund and Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund?
Axis Gilt Fund: Devang Shah, Sachin Jain. Canara Robeco Dynamic Term Fund: Avnish Jain / Mr. Bhupesh Kalyani.
Sources: NAV and expense ratio from AMFI. Holdings from each fund house's monthly portfolio statement. Fund facts from each scheme summary document.
This page is information, not investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme related documents carefully. Past returns do not promise future returns. Figures come from AMFI, NSE, BSE and each fund house's own documents.